A Canadian perspective on anterior cervical discectomies: practice patterns and preferences
- PMID: 29732425
- PMCID: PMC5911759
- DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.01
A Canadian perspective on anterior cervical discectomies: practice patterns and preferences
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the current practice patterns of Canadian neurosurgeons with regards to anterior cervical discectomy (ACD).
Methods: A one-page questionnaire was sent out using SurveyMonkey to all neurosurgeon members of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (CNSF). End points were surgeon preference for ACD surgical method, graft source, the length of collar usage and the recommended time before returning to work.
Results: Response rate was 74.0%. Of the responders, 75.0% performed single level ACD and 18.3% had completed spine fellowships. The majority (68.2%) chose ACD with fusion and plating (ACDFP) as their preferred method with allograft being the most popular choice of fusion material (44.3%). Most of the respondents did not prescribe collars (60.9%) and when they did, hard collar was prescribed most often (76.9%) and AspenTM collar was the most popular choice (67.7%). The majority of surgeons chose 'other' as their response for length of time for collar use (40.0%) while allowing them to take their collars off at night (78.1%). Most of the surgeons recommended physiotherapy post-operatively (58.1%) and time to physiotherapy was 6-8 weeks. Recommended back to work time was 6 weeks for 44.9% of respondents. In the cross analysis, surgeons who performed ACDF were more likely to prescribe collars (50%, P=0.01) versus surgeons who performed ACDFP (21.7%, P=0.01).
Conclusions: Our survey is an up to date description of current practice patterns for ACD amongst Canadian neurosurgeons.
Keywords: Anterior; cervical; collar; discectomy; survey.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Controversies in cervical discectomy and fusion: practice patterns among Canadian surgeons.Can J Neurol Sci. 2004 Nov;31(4):478-83. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100003668. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15595251
-
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Practice Patterns Among Greek Spinal Surgeons.J Clin Med Res. 2016 Jul;8(7):506-12. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2572w. Epub 2016 May 29. J Clin Med Res. 2016. PMID: 27298658 Free PMC article.
-
Current practice of cervical disc arthroplasty: a survey among 383 AOSpine International members.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E8. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16338. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28142263
-
Lumbar discectomy: a national survey of neurosurgeons and literature review.Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Mar;36(2):196-200. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100006557. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19378714 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17):1989-97. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000176332.67849.ea. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16135991 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of surgeons' experience and practice on postoperative cervical collar use after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a cross-sectional survey in Heilongjiang province, China.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08880-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40616052 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive vs. Traditional Open Spinal Fusion: A Comparative Analysis.J Spine Res Surg. 2025;7(1):18-25. Epub 2025 Mar 26. J Spine Res Surg. 2025. PMID: 40297592 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion at one and two levels: trends and factors associated with structural allograft versus synthetic cages.N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jan 26;17:100310. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100310. eCollection 2024 Mar. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024. PMID: 38390524 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources