Aggregate Exposure Pathways in Support of Risk Assessment
- PMID: 29736486
- PMCID: PMC5935252
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2018.03.006
Aggregate Exposure Pathways in Support of Risk Assessment
Abstract
Over time, risk assessment has shifted from establishing relationships between exposure to a single chemical and a resulting adverse health outcome, to evaluation of multiple chemicals and disease outcomes simultaneously. As a result, there is an increasing need to better understand the complex mechanisms that influence risk of chemical and non-chemical stressors, beginning at their source and ending at a biological endpoint relevant to human or ecosystem health risk assessment. Just as the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework has emerged as a means of providing insight into mechanism-based toxicity, the exposure science community has seen the recent introduction of the Aggregate Exposure Pathway (AEP) framework. AEPs aid in making exposure data applicable to the FAIR (i.e., findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) principle, especially by (1) organizing continuous flow of disjointed exposure information;(2) identifying data gaps, to focus resources on acquiring the most relevant data; (3) optimizing use and repurposing of existing exposure data; and (4) facilitating interoperability among predictive models. Herein, we discuss integration of the AOP and AEP frameworks and how such integration can improve confidence in both traditional and cumulative risk assessment approaches.
Keywords: Adverse Outcome Pathway; Aggregate Exposure Pathway; risk assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- NRC. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations. National Academies Press (US); 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK424987/ accessed April 4, 2017. - PubMed
-
- Meek ME(Bette), Palermo CM, Bachman AN, North CM, Lewis R Jeffrey. Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence. J Appl Toxicol. 2014;34:595–606. doi: 10.1002/jat.2984. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrrano JA, Tietge JE, Villeneuve DL. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010;29:730–741. doi: 10.1002/etc.34. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Villeneuve DL, Crump D, Garcia-Reyero N, Hecker M, Hutchinson TH, LaLone CA, Landesmann B, Lettieri T, Munn S, Nepelska M, Ottinger MA, Vergauwen L, Whelan M. Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles. Toxicol Sci. 2014;142:312–320. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials