Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr-Jun;15(2):103-108.
doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_203_17.

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Experience of 60 cases from a developing world hospital

Affiliations

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Experience of 60 cases from a developing world hospital

Mudassir Maqbool Wani et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2019 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, which has been quoted to have a success rate equivalent to open ureterolithotomy for uretric stones, can be performed transperitoneally and retroperitoneally. The aim of the present study is to report our experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy, its results and advantages in the current era of minimally invasive surgery in a developing country.

Patients and methods: It was a prospective study carried from May 2010 to December 2012. 60 patients diagnosed with upper and middle uretric calculi, with sizes more than 1 cm and with value of more than 1500 hu on CT Urography ,underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy.

Results: All patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy successfully. The mean operative time was 64.53 min. The mean blood loss was 39.83 ml. 3 patients had minor intra-operative complications which were tackled on table. Post-operative complications developed in 3 patients, all minor. There were no major complications. The removal of drain was at (2.7 days). Mean hospital stay was of 3.3 days. Patients reported to their routine activities in 1.78 weeks. During follow-up 3 months later, CT urography revealed normal ureter in all cases.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy has low rate of conversion to open surgery and an acceptable overall complication rates. In selected patients with impacted, hard, large ureteral stones, which are likely to cause diffi-culty in endo-urological procedures, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a reason-able treatment option.

Keywords: Endourological procedures; laparoscopic surgery; retroperitoneal laparoscopy; shock wave lithotripsy; ureteric stones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

    1. Wickham JE, editor. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1979. The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Urinary Calculus Disease; pp. 145–98.
    1. Raboy A, Ferzli GS, Ioffreda R, Albert PS. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Urology. 1992;39:223–5. - PubMed
    1. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS, Shah BC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for multiple upper mid ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1994;151:1001–2. - PubMed
    1. Wolf JS, Jr, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. What is its role in 1997? Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24:43–58. - PubMed
    1. Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak JP, Hampel N, Resnick MI. Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;159:374–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources