Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 8;49(1):43.
doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6.

Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives

Richard Ducatelle et al. Vet Res. .

Abstract

Intestinal health is determined by host (immunity, mucosal barrier), nutritional, microbial and environmental factors. Deficiencies in intestinal health are associated with shifts in the composition of the intestinal microbiome (dysbiosis), leakage of the mucosal barrier and/or inflammation. Since the ban on growth promoting antimicrobials in animal feed, these dysbiosis-related problems have become a major issue, especially in intensive animal farming. The economical and animal welfare consequences are considerable. Consequently, there is a need for continuous monitoring of the intestinal health status, particularly in intensively reared animals, where the intestinal function is often pushed to the limit. In the current review, the recent advances in the field of intestinal health biomarkers, both in human and veterinary medicine are discussed, trying to identify present and future markers of intestinal health in poultry. The most promising new biomarkers will be stable molecules ending up in the feces and litter that can be quantified, preferably using rapid and simple pen-side tests. It is unlikely, however, that a single biomarker will be sufficient to follow up all aspects of intestinal health. Combinations of multiple biomarkers and/or metabarcoding, metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, metaproteomic and metabolomic approaches will be the way to go in the future. Candidate biomarkers currently are being investigated by many research groups, but the validation will be a major challenge, due to the complexity of intestinal health in the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intestinal mucosal barrier damage. Different aspects of intestinal health defects (leakage inside-out/outside-in; dysbiosis; inflammation) can be evaluated in different types of samples (blood; liver; mucosal biopsies; intestinal content; faeces).

References

    1. Collett SR. Nutrition and wet litter problems in poultry. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2012;173:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.013. - DOI
    1. Hughes ER, Winter MG, Duerkop BA, Spiga L, de Carvalho TF, Zhu WH, Gillis CC, Buttner L, Smoot MP, Behrendt CL, Cherry S, Santos RL, Hooper LV, Winter SE. Microbial respiration and formate oxidation as metabolic signatures of inflammation-associated dysbiosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.01.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin NR, Whon TW, Bae JW. Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Travis S, Menzies I. Intestinal permeability: functional assessment and significance. Clin Sci. 1992;82:471–488. doi: 10.1042/cs0820471. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorensen JS, Dearing MD. Efflux transporters as a novel herbivore countermechanism to plant chemical defenses. J Chem Ecol. 2006;32:1181–1196. doi: 10.1007/s10886-006-9079-y. - DOI - PubMed