Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 8;8(1):7303.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25605-3.

Transcriptome analyses reveal reduced hepatic lipid synthesis and accumulation in more feed efficient beef cattle

Affiliations

Transcriptome analyses reveal reduced hepatic lipid synthesis and accumulation in more feed efficient beef cattle

Robert Mukiibi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The genetic mechanisms controlling residual feed intake (RFI) in beef cattle are still largely unknown. Here we performed whole transcriptome analyses to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes and their functional roles in liver tissues between six extreme high and six extreme low RFI steers from three beef breed populations including Angus, Charolais, and Kinsella Composite (KC). On average, the next generation sequencing yielded 34 million single-end reads per sample, of which 87% were uniquely mapped to the bovine reference genome. At false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change (FC) > 2, 72, 41, and 175 DE genes were identified in Angus, Charolais, and KC, respectively. Most of the DE genes were breed-specific, while five genes including TP53INP1, LURAP1L, SCD, LPIN1, and ENSBTAG00000047029 were common across the three breeds, with TP53INP1, LURAP1L, SCD, and LPIN1 being downregulated in low RFI steers of all three breeds. The DE genes are mainly involved in lipid, amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, energy production, molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry, cellular development, and cell death and survival. Furthermore, our differential gene expression results suggest reduced hepatic lipid synthesis and accumulation processes in more feed efficient beef cattle of all three studied breeds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagrams showing: (a) overlap of expressed genes (>1CPM in ≥6 samples) in the three studied breed populations; (b) overlap of differentially expressed genes (DE genes) in the three studied breed populations; (c) overlap of biological functions enriched by DE genes identified in the three studied breed populations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression profile (log2 (Fold-change)) in low-RFI steers of the five differentially expressed (DE) genes common across all three breeds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Metabolic process regulatory gene network showing differentially expressed (DE) genes involved in the different lipid metabolic processes and their predicted activation or deactivation levels in Angus low-RFI steers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Metabolic process regulatory gene network showing differentially expressed (DE) genes involved in the different lipid metabolic processes and their predicted activation or deactivation levels in Charolais low-RFI steers.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Metabolic process regulatory gene network showing differentially expressed (DE) genes involved in the different lipid metabolic processes and their predicted activation or deactivation levels in KC low-RFI steers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ramsey R, et al. Factors affecting beef cow-herd costs, production, and profits. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2005;37:91–99. doi: 10.1017/S1074070800007124. - DOI
    1. Van Heugten, E. Growing-finishing swine nutrient recommendations and feeding management. National SwineNutritionGuide (ed. Meisinger, D.J.) 80-95 (2010).
    1. Shalev B, Pasternak H. Meat production efficiencies of turkey, chicken and duck broilers. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1989;45:109–114. doi: 10.1079/WPS19890008. - DOI
    1. Salter AM. Improving the sustainability of global meat and milk production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2017;76:22–27. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116000276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archer J, Richardson E, Herd R, Arthur P. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Crop Pasture Sci. 1999;50:147–162. doi: 10.1071/A98075. - DOI

Publication types