Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul;33(7):1167-1176.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4410-1. Epub 2018 May 8.

Rapid Evidence Review of Mobile Applications for Self-management of Diabetes

Stephanie Veazie  1 , Kara Winchell  2 , Jennifer Gilbert  2 , Robin Paynter  2 , Ilya Ivlev  3 , Karen B Eden  3 , Kerri Nussbaum  3 , Nicole Weiskopf  3 , Jeanne-Marie Guise  2   4 , Mark Helfand  3   5
Affiliations
Review

Rapid Evidence Review of Mobile Applications for Self-management of Diabetes

Stephanie Veazie et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes lack information on which commercially available applications (apps) improve diabetes-related outcomes. We conducted a rapid evidence review to examine features, clinical efficacy, and usability of apps for self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults.

Methods: Ovid/Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for systematic reviews and technology assessments. Reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were examined for primary studies. Additional searches for primary studies were conducted online, through Ovid/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov . Studies were evaluated for eligibility based on predetermined criteria, data were extracted, study quality was assessed using a risk of bias tool, information on app features was collected, and app usability was assessed. Results are summarized qualitatively.

Results: Fifteen articles evaluating 11 apps were identified: six apps for type 1 and five apps for type 2 diabetes. Common features of apps included setting reminders and tracking blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), medication use, physical activity, and weight. Compared with controls, use of eight apps, when paired with support from a healthcare provider or study staff, improved at least one outcome, most often HbA1c. Patients did not experience improvements in quality of life, blood pressure, or weight, regardless of app used or type of diabetes. Study quality was variable. Of the eight apps available for usability testing, two were scored "acceptable," three were "marginal," and three were "not acceptable."

Discussion: Limited evidence suggests that use of some commercially available apps, when combined with additional support from a healthcare provider or study staff, may improve some short-term diabetes-related outcomes. The impact of these apps on longer-term outcomes is unclear. More rigorous and longer-term studies of apps are needed.

Registration: This review was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The protocol is available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/topics/diabetes-mobile-devices/research-protocol .

Keywords: consumer health informatics; decision making; diabetes; self-management; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature flowchart. .
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report (2017). Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. 2017; Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-stati.... Accessed January 29, 2018.
    1. Beck J GD, Blanton L, Bollinger ST, Butcher MK et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. 2017. Available at: http://professional.diabetes.org/sites/professional.diabetes.org/files/m.... Accessed January 29, 2018.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Telehealth Programs. Nov 2015; Available at: https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/telehealth/index.html. Accessed Jan 29, 2018.
    1. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states. 2010; Available at: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_telemedicine_2010.pdf. Accessed Jan 29, 2018.
    1. van Dyk L. A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(2):1279–1298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110201279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types