Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 1;124(15):3171-3180.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31535. Epub 2018 May 9.

Development of a novel salivary gland cancer lymph node staging system

Affiliations

Development of a novel salivary gland cancer lymph node staging system

Katri Aro et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Current lymph node (LN) staging for salivary gland cancer (SGC) is extrapolated from mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, given its unique biology and clinical behavior, it is possible that a SGC-specific LN staging system would be more accurate.

Methods: Patients from the National Cancer Data Base with nonmetastatic SGC of the head and neck who were diagnosed from 2004 through 2013 and underwent surgical resection and neck dissection removing at least 10 LNs were included. Multivariable models were constructed to assess the association between survival and LN factors, including number of metastatic LNs, extranodal extension, LN size, and lower LN involvement.

Results: Overall, 4520 patients met the inclusion criteria. An increasing number of metastatic LNs was found to be strongly associated with worse survival without plateau. The risk of death increased more rapidly up to 4 LNs (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.41 [P < .001]), and was more gradual for additional LNs >4 (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03 [P < .001]). LN size, extranodal extension, and lower LN involvement appeared to have no impact on survival when accounting for the number of metastatic LNs. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to create a novel SGC LN staging system in which N0 indicates 0 positive LNs, N1 indicates 1 to 2 positive LNs, N2 indicates 3 to 21 positive LNs, and N3 indicates ≥ 22 positive LNs. This system exhibited greater concordance than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition) system.

Conclusions: Quantitative LN burden is an important determinant of survival in patients with SGC. Use of this variable may improve SGC staging. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: lymph nodes; neck dissection; salivary gland cancer; staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The adjusted hazard ratio of death as a non-linear function of A) number of positive lymph nodes, with 0 positive lymph nodes as a reference, and B) number of lymph nodes examined, with 10 lymph nodes examined as a reference, for patients with salivary gland cancer. The gray area represents the 95% confidence interval of the natural logarithm of the predicted hazard ratios. The black curve represents the smoothed restricted cubic spline plot of the natural logarithm of the predicted adjusted hazard ratio for survival versus number of lymph nodes. The black vertical lines represent the calculated change point of 4 positive lymph nodes and 33 lymph nodes examined, respectively, for the hazard of death as a function of lymph node number.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Defining a novel nodal staging system for salivary gland cancer in patients with determinable American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage, using recursive partitioning analysis based on number of positive lymph nodes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimates for the A) proposed and B) AJCC 8th edition N classification systems in salivary gland cancers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier estimates for the proposed composite stage grouping, based on the sum of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition pathologic tumor classification and the proposed nodal classification. Patients with equal sums of these two classifications were grouped together (Stage I: T1N0, Stage II: T2N0/T1N1, Stage IIIA: T3N0/T2N1/T1N2, Stage IIIB: T3N1/T4N0/T2N2/T1N3, Stage IIIC: T4N1/T3N2/T2N3, Stage IVA: T4N2/T3N3, Stage IVB: T4N3).

References

    1. Lloyd S, Yu JB, Ross DA, Wilson LD, Decker RH. A prognostic index for predicting lymph node metastasis in minor salivary gland cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):169–75. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong JG, Harrison LB, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H, Fass DE, Zelefsky MJ, et al. The indications for elective treatment of the neck in cancer of the major salivary glands. Cancer. 1992 Feb 1;69(3):615–9. - PubMed
    1. Yoo SH, Roh JL, Kim SO, Cho KJ, Choi SH, Nam SY, et al. Patterns and treatment of neck metastases in patients with salivary gland cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;111(8):1000–6. - PubMed
    1. Ali S, Palmer FL, Yu C, DiLorenzo M, Shah JP, Kattan MW, et al. A predictive nomogram for recurrence of carcinoma of the major salivary glands. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;139(7):698–705. - PubMed
    1. Zeidan YH, Pekelis L, An Y, Holsinger FC, Kong CS, Chang DT, et al. Survival benefit for adjuvant radiation therapy in minor salivary gland cancers. Oral Oncol. 2015 May;51(5):438–45. - PubMed

Publication types