Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;22(4):249-262.
doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_165_18.

Definition of Terms Used in Limitation of Treatment and Providing Palliative Care at the End of Life: The Indian Council of Medical Research Commission Report

Naveen Salins  1 , Roop Gursahani  2 , Roli Mathur  3 , Shivakumar Iyer  4 , Stanley Macaden  5   6 , Nagesh Simha  7 , Raj Kumar Mani  8 , M R Rajagopal  9   10
Affiliations

Definition of Terms Used in Limitation of Treatment and Providing Palliative Care at the End of Life: The Indian Council of Medical Research Commission Report

Naveen Salins et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Indian hospitals, in general, lack policies on the limitation of inappropriate life-sustaining interventions at the end of life. To facilitate discussion, preparation of guidelines and framing of laws, terminologies relating to the treatment limitation, and providing palliative care at the end-of-life care (EOLC) need to be defined and brought up to date.

Methodology: This consensus document on terminologies and definitions of terminologies was prepared under the aegis of the Indian Council of Medical Research. The consensus statement was created using Nominal Group and Delphi Method.

Results: Twenty-five definitions related to the limitations of treatment and providing palliative care at the end of life were created by reviewing existing international documents and suitably modifying it to the Indian sociocultural context by achieving national consensus. Twenty-five terminologies defined within the scope of this document are (1) terminal illness, (2) actively dying, (3) life-sustaining treatment, (4) potentially inappropriate treatment, (5) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), (6) do not attempt CPR, (7) withholding life-sustaining treatment, (8) withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, (9) euthanasia (10) active shortening of the dying process, (11) physician-assisted suicide, (12) palliative care, (13) EOLC, (14) palliative sedation, (15) double effect, (16) death, (17) best interests, (18) health-care decision-making capacity, (19) shared decision-making, (20) advance directives, (21) surrogates, (22) autonomy, (23) beneficence, (24) nonmaleficence, and (25) justice.

Keywords: End of life; limitation of treatment; palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F French LATAREA Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in Intensive-Care Units in France: A prospective survey. French LATAREA Group. Lancet. 2001;357:9–14. - PubMed
    1. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, et al. End-of-life practices in European Intensive Care Units: The Ethicus study. JAMA. 2003;290:790–7. - PubMed
    1. Kapadia F, Singh M, Divatia J, Vaidyanathan P, Udwadia FE, Raisinghaney SJ, et al. Limitation and withdrawal of intensive therapy at the end of life: Practices in Intensive Care Units in Mumbai, India. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1272–5. - PubMed
    1. Mani R. Limitation of life support in the ICU: Ethical issues relating to end of life care. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2003;7:112.
    1. Mani RK, Mandal AK, Bal S, Javeri Y, Kumar R, Nama DK, et al. End-of-life decisions in an Indian Intensive Care Unit. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1713–9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources