Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 10:12:823.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.823. eCollection 2018.

Risk-sharing agreements, present and future

Affiliations
Review

Risk-sharing agreements, present and future

Francisco R Gonçalves et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Risk-sharing agreements between pharmaceutical companies and payers stand out as a recent practice, the use of which has been increasing in the case of innovative medicines, particularly in the field of oncology, which aims to ensure better budgetary control and a lower risk of spending on medicinal products without full evidence of clinical benefit. In this article, the authors discuss the types of existing agreements, as well as those used in Portugal, their advantages, disadvantages and future challenges of implementation, as well as their potential role in access to therapeutic innovation, namely medicines for cancer treatment. For this purpose, a nonsystematic review of indexed and nonconventional literature was carried out. There is a tendency for the risk-sharing agreements established between payers and pharmaceutical companies to include a component of monitoring the use of medicines and outcomes measurement, involving real life data collection. Portugal is no exception and, although most agreements are still financial in nature, there is already a strong desire for other agreements, in particular clinical outcomes based. It is concluded that there is not yet a gold standard methodology in relation to the type of agreements to be practiced. Moreover, its opportunity cost, including the cost of implementation, remains to be scrutinised. However, regardless of the type of agreement, the advantages of adopting these agreements are well known, inevitably related with challenges of implementation. The need for an infrastructure to support information sharing is undisputed and urgent. The future of therapeutic innovation and increased pressure on health budgets will require alternative, more flexible models, personalized reimbursement models that allow alignment of medicines prices with the value they deliver in treating the several diseases.

Keywords: access; agreement; price per combination; price per indication; risk sharing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Taxonomy for risk-sharing agreements.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Recommendations for RSAs.

References

    1. Pugatach M, Healy P, Chu R. Sharing the Burden: Could Risk-Sharing Change the Way We Pay For Healthcare? London: The Stockholm Network; 2010. [13/12/17]. [ www.stockholm-network.org]
    1. Grimm S, Strong M, Brennan A, et al. Sheffield: NICE Decision Support Unit; 2016. [13/12/17]. Framework for analysing risk in health technology assessment and its application to managed entry agreements. [ http://www.nicedsu.org.uk/DSU%20Managed%20Access%20report%20FINAL.pdf]
    1. Espín J, Rovira J, Gracia L. EmiNet, Andalusian School of Public Health; 2011. Experiences and impact of European risk–sharing schemes focusing on oncology medicines experiences and impact of European risk-sharing schemes focusing on oncology medicines. [ http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/7608/attachments/1/translations/e...]
    1. Boer B, Korte P, Kruger P, et al. Conditional Reimbursement Working Group, Apollo Network; 2011. Sharing risks, sharing benefits.
    1. Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements–good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16:703–719. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources