Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery
- PMID: 29744334
- PMCID: PMC5934136
- DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.05.05
Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery
Abstract
Background: The premise of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is to minimize facial and muscle injury in order to enhance recovery from surgery. Robotic MIS surgery for resection of tumors in solid organs is gaining traction, though clear superiority of this approach is lacking and robotic surgery is more expensive. Our philosophy in robotically-assisted hepatectomy has been to employ this approach for cases where location of tumors make difficult a classical laparoscopic approach (superior/posterior tumors), and cases where the incision for an open operation dominates the course of recovery.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
Results: In this study we report 97 cases of liver resection subjected to the robotic approach, of which 90% were resected robotically. The mean operative time was 186±9 min; mean blood loss was 111±15 mL, and complications occurred in 9%. Two thirds of the patients remained in hospital 3 days or less, including three patients subjected to hemihepatectomy (2 left and 1 right). Fourteen individuals were discharged on the same day. The strongest predictors of long hospital stay (>3 days) were major hepatectomy (P=0.007), complications (P=0.008), and operative time >210 min (P=0.001).
Conclusions: With thoughtful case selection, this is a first demonstration that hepatectomy can be conducted as an out-patient or short-stay procedure.
Keywords: Adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS); enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); robotic MIS hepatectomy; surgical outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures


Comment in
-
Robotic resection for posterosuperior liver lesions: is it really superior to laparoscopic resection?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Jun;8(3):264-266. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.12.12. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019. PMID: 31245409 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Time to take another look at perceived disadvantages of robotic hepatectomy.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Apr;9(2):208-210. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.10.14. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32355681 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is the robot necessary for enhanced recovery after minimally invasive surgery hepatectomy?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Apr;9(2):219-220. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.10.32. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32355684 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Can robotic liver resection compensate for weaknesses of the laparoscopic approach?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Jun;9(3):385-387. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.11.02. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32509837 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The future of robotic liver surgery.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Aug;9(4):546-547. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2020.03.17. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32832516 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Park J, Chen YJ, Lu WP, et al. The evolution of liver-directed treatments for hepatic colorectal metastases. Oncology (Williston Park) 2014;28:991-1003. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources