Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 3;3(3):218-224.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.03.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Antibacterial forsterite (Mg2SiO4) scaffold: A promising bioceramic for load bearing applications

Affiliations

Antibacterial forsterite (Mg2SiO4) scaffold: A promising bioceramic for load bearing applications

Rajan Choudhary et al. Bioact Mater. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In the current work, forsterite samples with different surface area were investigated for its antibacterial activity. Dissolution studies show that the lower degradation of forsterite compared to other silicate bioceramics, which is a desirable property for repairing bone defects. Forsterite scaffold shows superior compressive strength than the cortical bone after immersion in simulated body fluid. Bactericidal tests indicate that the forsterite had inhibition effect on the growth of clinical bacterial isolates. Forsterite may be a suitable candidate material for load bearing applications with enhanced mechanical properties and lower degradation rate.

Keywords: Antibacterial; Bone; Dissolution; Magnesium silicate; Mechanical stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
XRD pattern of forsterite samples after sintering.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SEM micrographs of FG (a), FU (c) and EDX pattern of FG (b), FU (d) samples.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Degradation behavior (a) compressive strength (b) and Young's modulus (c) of forsterite samples after 30 days of immersion in SBF.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage inhibition of different clinical pathogens by pure forsterite (FG and FU).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Growth of S. aureus on (a) control, (b) FG 2 mg/mL, (c) FU 2 mg/mL; The growth of E. Coli on (d) control, (e) FG 2 mg/mL and (f) FU 2 mg/mL in agar medium.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
SEM micrographs of forsterite samples after antibacterial studies; Control E. coli (a), FG E. coli (b), FU E. coli (c), Control S. aureus (d), FG S. aureus (e), FU S. aureus (f).

References

    1. Kitsugi T., Nakamura T., Yamamura T., Kokubu T., Shibuya T., Takagi M. SEM-EPMA observation of three types of apatite containing glass-ceramics implanted in bone: the variance of a Ca-P-rich layer. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1987;21:1255–1271. - PubMed
    1. Nakano M. Implant study of glass-ceramics in rat femurs–evaluations for dental implant applications. The Journal of the Stomatological Society. 1991;58:198–233. - PubMed
    1. Liu X., Tao S., Ding C. Bioactivity of plasma sprayed dicalcium silicate coatings. Biomaterials. 2002;23:963–968. - PubMed
    1. Wu C., Chang J. Synthesis and apatite-formation ability of akermanite. Mater. Lett. 2004;58:2415–2417.
    1. Wu C., Chang J., Wang J., Ni S., Zhai W. Preparation and characteristics of a calcium magnesium silicate (bredigite) bioactive ceramic. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2925–2931. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources