Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 11;6(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0346-6.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis in patients with advanced malignancies: retrospective review at MD Anderson

Affiliations
Review

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis in patients with advanced malignancies: retrospective review at MD Anderson

Yinghong Wang et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are gaining increasing popularity as an efficacious treatment for advanced malignancies. ICPI treatment can be complicated by diarrhea and colitis. Systemic steroids are the first line treatment. Infliximab is reserved for severe refractory cases. We aimed to assess the impact of ICPI-induced diarrhea and colitis and their immunosuppressive treatment on patients' outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted in 327 cancer patients who received ICPIs between 2011 and 2017. Patients with ICPI-induced toxicities in other organs were excluded. We collected data about patient demographics, clinical variables, and overall survival. We used descriptive analysis to compare different groups based on the occurrence and the treatment of diarrhea and colitis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare overall survival durations between groups.

Results: Diarrhea was recorded in 117 (36%) patients; 79 (24%) of them required immunosuppressive treatment of either systemic corticosteroid without infliximab (n = 44) or with infliximab (n = 35). Caucasian ethnicity, melanoma, stage 3 cancer, and ipilimumab were predictors of colitis that requires immunosuppression. Patients who required immunosuppressants had better overall survival than those who did not require treatment for colitis or diarrhea (P < 0.001). Immunosuppression for diarrhea or colitis did not affect the overall survival significantly (P = 0.232), nor did the choice of treatment (corticosteroids with vs. without infliximab; P = 0.768). Diarrhea was an independent predictor of a favorable overall survival (P < 0.001), irrespective of treatment need (P = 0.003). We confirmed the same results in a subgroup analysis for patients with stage IV malignancies only. Patients who received long duration of steroid treatment (> 30 days) had numerically higher infection rate than those who received steroid for shorter duration (40.4 vs. 25.8%, P = 0.160). Likewise, long duration of steroid without infliximab was associated with increased risk of infection compared to short duration of steroid with infliximab (42.9% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.089).

Conclusions: Patients with ICPI-induced diarrhea or colitis have improved survival outcomes. Diarrhea is an independent predictor of an improved survival regardless of treatment requirement. Immunosuppressive treatment for diarrhea did not significantly affect overall survival, however, infection rates were numerically higher among patients who received steroids for a long duration. Therefore, early non-steroid immunosuppressive therapy may ensure a more favorable overall outcome.

Keywords: Colitis; Diarrhea; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Overall survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Waiver of informed consent was granted because there was minimal risk to subjects as A) this study retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients as part of established or routine standard of care, B) no diagnostic or therapeutic interventions were performed, C) no patient contact was involved, D) consent was impractical to obtain from some patient because they were lost to follow-up or deceased.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall survival in various patient groups. a Patients with diarrhea or colitis requiring treatment compared with patients who had no or mild symptoms not requiring treatment. b Patients with diarrhea or colitis requiring treatment compared with patients who did not develop diarrhea. c Patients with diarrhea requiring treatment compared with those with diarrhea not requiring treatment. d Patients with diarrhea treated with steroids alone compared with those requiring infliximab. e Patients who developed diarrhea compared with those who did not. f Patients with diarrhea that did not require treatment compared with those who did not develop diarrhea
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall survival in patients with different cancer stages. a All patients with stage III melanoma and solid tumor malignancies compared with stage IV. b GI irAE patients with stage III melanoma and solid tumor malignancies compared with stage IV
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival in patients with stage IV disease. a Patients with diarrhea or colitis requiring treatment compared with patients who had no or mild symptoms not requiring treatment. b Patients with diarrhea or colitis requiring treatment compared with patients who did not develop diarrhea. c Patients with diarrhea requiring treatment compared with those with diarrhea not requiring treatment. d Patients with diarrhea treated with steroids alone compared with those requiring infliximab. e Patients who developed diarrhea compared with those who did not. f Patients with diarrhea that did not require treatment compared with those who did not develop diarrhea
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Rates of infectious events in patients given immunosuppression treatments. a Patients who received steroids for a long duration compared with those who received steroids for a short duration. b Patients who received infliximab and short-duration (≤ 30 days) steroids compared with those who received long-duration (> 30 days) steroids alone

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1803–1813. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–1639. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–2454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ribas A, Hamid O, Daud A, et al. Association of Pembrolizumab with Tumor Response and Survival among Patients with Advanced Melanoma. JAMA. 2016;315:1600–1609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4059. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources