Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;25(20):20241-20254.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2104-1. Epub 2018 May 11.

Assessment of reactive nitrogen mitigation potential of different nitrogen treatments under direct-seeded rice and wheat cropping system

Affiliations

Assessment of reactive nitrogen mitigation potential of different nitrogen treatments under direct-seeded rice and wheat cropping system

Jingyan Jiang et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

The reactive nitrogen (Nr) pollution is a serious environmental problem. A wise application of nitrogen fertilizer is important for mitigating Nr loss. Field experiments were undertaken during the direct-seeded rice and winter-wheat growing seasons from 2014 to 2015 in Nanjing, one of the typical rice-wheat rotation regions in China, to evaluate the potential of different nitrogen fertilizers for mitigating Nr (N2O, NH3 emissions, and NO3- leaching) losses. Seven different fertilizer treatments were included in this study: a no fertilizer treatment (NF), conventional fertilizer (CF), urea-ammonium mixed nitrogen fertilizer (UA), stabilized urea (UHD; urea + hydroquinone + dicyandiamide), sulfur-coated urea (SCU), urea formaldehyde (UF) and organic fertilizer (OF). In comparison with the CF, all the fertilizer treatments except for UA decreased NH3 volatilization by 14.5-36.0% (p < 0.05), while none of the N fertilizers had an obvious mitigation effect on N2O emissions and NO3- leaching during the rice and wheat seasons. Further analyses showed that the UHD, UF and OF treatments reduced the yield-scaled Nr loss (NLI) by 32.6-42.5% for the rice season and by 15.5-34.5% for the wheat season as compared to the CF; other treatments relative to CF had no obvious effect with regard to lowering the NLI. UHD, UF and OF could be adopted as an effective mitigation alternative to reduce Nr loss and maintain crop yield in future rice/wheat production. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Keywords: Direct-seeded rice/wheat cropping system; Mitigation potential; N2O emission; NH3 volatilization; NO3 − leaching; Nitrogen fertilizer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Microbes Environ. 2008;23(1):29-34 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 3;106(9):3041-6 - PubMed
    1. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;533:329-38 - PubMed
    1. Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:86-94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources