Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 17;9(29):20555-20562.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24994.

Should reporting of peri-neural invasion and extra prostatic extension be mandatory in prostate cancer biopsies? correlation with outcome in biopsy cases treated conservatively

Amar S Ahmad  1 , Vishnu Parameshwaran  2 , Luis Beltran  2 , Gabrielle Fisher  1 , Bernard V North  1 , David Greenberg  3 , Geraldine Soosay  4 , Henrik Møller  5 , Peter Scardino  6 , Jack Cuzick  1 , Daniel M Berney  2 ; Transatlantic Prostate Group
Affiliations

Should reporting of peri-neural invasion and extra prostatic extension be mandatory in prostate cancer biopsies? correlation with outcome in biopsy cases treated conservatively

Amar S Ahmad et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

The identification of perineural invasion (PNI) and extraprostatic extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC) biopsies is time consuming and can be difficult. Although this is required information in many datasets, there is little evidence on their effect on outcome in patients treated conservatively. Cases of PC were identified from three cancer registries in the UK from men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by needle biopsy from 1990-2003. The endpoint was prostate cancer death (DOD). Patients treated radically within 6 months, those with objective evidence of metastases or who had prior hormone therapy were excluded. Follow-up was through cancer registries up until 2012. Deaths were divided into those from PC and those from other causes, according to WHO criteria. 988 biopsy cases (6522 biopsy cores) were centrally reviewed by three uropathologists and assigned a Gleason score and Grade Group (GG). The presence of both PNI and ECE was recorded. Of 988 patients, PNI was present in 288 (DOD = 75) and ECE in 23 (DOD = 5). On univariable analysis PNI was highly significantly associated with DOD (hazard ratio [HR] 2.28, 95% CI: 1.68, 3.1, log-rank test p-value = 4.8 × 10-8), but ECE was not (log-rank test p-value = 0.334). On multivariable analysis with GG, serum PSA (per 10%), clinical stage and extent of disease (per 10%), PNI lost significance (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.63, likelihood ratio test p-value = 0.371). The utility of routinely examining prostate biopsies for ECE and PNI is doubtful as it is not independently associated with higher grade, stage or prognosis.

Keywords: Gleason score; perineural invasion; prostate cancer; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate for patients with PNI versus patients without PNI
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of the PNI stratified by GG groups for time to DOD
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Grading C. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:244–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pathologists RCo prostate dataset proformas. 2016 https://www.rcpath.org/resourceLibrary/g048-prostatedatasetproformas-jun....
    1. Pathologists CoA Protocol for the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland. 2017 http://www.cap.org/ShowProperty?nodePath=/UCMCon/Contribution%20Folders/.... - PubMed
    1. Harnden P, Shelley MD, Clements H, Coles B, Tyndale-Biscoe RS, Naylor B, Mason MD. The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review. Cancer. 2007;109:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22388. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turner RM, 2nd, Yecies TS, Yabes JG, Ristau BT, Woldemichael E, Davies BJ, Jacobs BL, Nelson JB. Biopsy Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Active Surveillance by Strict and Expanded Criteria. Urology. 2017;102:173–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed