Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 9:13:164-171.
doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0026. eCollection 2018.

Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations

Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Han Yanqing et al. Open Med (Wars). .

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by pooling the open published data.

Methods: An electronic search of databases Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Embase CBM, and CNKI were performed by two reviewers (Han Yanqing, Dong Cheng) independently to identify the studies relevant to serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The patient number of true positive(tp), false positive(fp), false negative(fn) and true negative(tn) were extracted from each included study. The diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer was assessed by pooled sensitivity, specificity and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC). All the data was pooled by MetaDiSc 1.4 and Stata/SE 11.0 statistical software. Results A total of 22 studies with 2474 colorectal patients and 1576 controls were included in the present study and meta-analysis. The combined diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.50 (95%CI:0.48-0.52) and 0.86 (95%CI:0.84-0.88) for serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio were 3.41(95%CI:2.57-4.53) and 0.62(0.55-0.71). The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.73. Deeks'funnel plot and Egger's line regression test (p=0.49) showed no significant publication bias in the present meta-analysis. Conclusion Due toits low diagnostic sensitivity, the diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker for colorectal cancer screening is limited.

Keywords: Biomarker; CA72-4; Colorectal cancer; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The publication searching flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
The methodological quality summary for each included study. (The authors’judgments for each risk of bias item. + is “low risk”; - is “high risk’’; ?is“moderate risk”).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The diagnostic sensitivity of serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 4
Figure 4
The diagnostic specificity of serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 5
Figure 5
Combined positive likelihoodratio(Positive LR) for serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 6
Figure 6
Combined negative likelihoodratio(negative LR) for serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 7
Figure 7
Combined DOR for serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 8
Figure 8
The pooled HSROC for serum CA72-4 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Figure 9
Figure 9
Deeks’funnel plot for evaluation of the publication bias

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2016. 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A.. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2015. 2012;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Fernandes LL, Martins LC, Nagashima CA, Nagae AC, Waisberg DR, Waisberg J.. CA72-4 antigen levels in serum and peritoneal washing in gastric cancer. Correlation with morphological aspects of neoplasia.ArqGastroenterol. 2007;44:235–239. - PubMed
    1. Granato T, Midulla C, Longo F, Colaprisca B, Frati L, Anastasi E.. Role of HE4, CA72.4, and CA125 in monitoring ovarian cancer. TumourBiol. 2012;33:1335–1339. - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Chen Q, Zhao Q, Liu M, Guo J.. Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017;47:260–263. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources