Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr-Jun;16(2):1474704918775253.
doi: 10.1177/1474704918775253.

Aggression and Helping as Responses to Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Rejection in Men and Women

Joanna Rajchert  1 , Karolina Konopka  1 , Paweł Boguszewski  1   2
Affiliations

Aggression and Helping as Responses to Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Rejection in Men and Women

Joanna Rajchert et al. Evol Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Research shows that interpersonal rejection increases aggression and decreases helping toward the rejecter. Based on the assumptions of the evolutionary approach, it was hypothesized that aggression would be higher and helping would be lower after rejection by a same-sex rather than an opposite-sex other. Moreover, it was predicted that the effect for aggression would be stronger in men, and the effect for helping would be stronger in women. Participants ( N = 100) were rejected or accepted by a same- or opposite-sex person, and later aggression and helping were measured using the tangram Help-Hurt task. The major finding was that same-sex rejection resulted in more aggression and less helping than opposite-sex rejection, but the rejectee's sex did not moderate the effect. Instead, men were more aggressive and less helping independently of condition. Along with the sexual exchange theory, more negative behavior in same-sex rejection could be interpreted as raised in-group sexual competitive tendencies, whereas less negative behavior in opposite-sex rejection could result from the motivation to exchange resources between men and women.

Keywords: aggression; helping; interpersonal rejection; opposite-sex; same-sex; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Means and 95% confidence intervals for helping (number of easy tangrams greater than 1) and hurting (number of difficult tangrams greater than 1) in experimental conditions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson C. A., Bushman B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 - PubMed
    1. Archer J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
    1. Archer J., Coyne S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230. - PubMed
    1. Aron A., Melinat E., Aron E. N., Vallone R. D., Bator R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377. doi:10.1177/0146167297234003
    1. Ayduk Ö., Gyurak A., Luerssen A. (2008). Individual differences in the rejection–aggression link in the hot sauce paradigm: The case of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 775–782. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.004 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources