Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 14;9(1):1888.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04089-9.

Aurora A-dependent CENP-A phosphorylation at inner centromeres protects bioriented chromosomes against cohesion fatigue

Affiliations

Aurora A-dependent CENP-A phosphorylation at inner centromeres protects bioriented chromosomes against cohesion fatigue

Grégory Eot-Houllier et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Sustained spindle tension applied to sister centromeres during mitosis eventually leads to uncoordinated loss of sister chromatid cohesion, a phenomenon known as "cohesion fatigue." We report that Aurora A-dependent phosphorylation of serine 7 of the centromere histone variant CENP-A (p-CENP-AS7) protects bioriented chromosomes against cohesion fatigue. Expression of a non-phosphorylatable version of CENP-A (CENP-AS7A) weakens sister chromatid cohesion only when sister centromeres are under tension, providing the first evidence of a regulated mechanism involved in protection against passive cohesion loss. Consistent with this observation, p-CENP-AS7 is detected at the inner centromere where it forms a discrete domain. The depletion or inhibition of Aurora A phenocopies the expression of CENP-AS7A and we show that Aurora A is recruited to centromeres in a Bub1-dependent manner. We propose that Aurora A-dependent phosphorylation of CENP-A at the inner centromere protects chromosomes against tension-induced cohesion fatigue until the last kinetochore is attached to spindle microtubules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Serine 7-phosphorylated CENP-A (p-CENP-AS7) localizes to the inner side of centromeres during mitosis. a Immunofluorescence on metaphase chromosome spreads from HeLa-S3 cells, double-stained with anti-CENP-A and anti-p-CENP-AS7 antibodies. Merged image with DAPI staining (blue), scale bar = 10 µm. Magnification × 7.5 of a single chromosome. b Distribution of p-CENP-AS7 (green) and CENP-A (red) at centromeres. Left panels: different patterns of immunofluorescence signals with p-CENP-AS7 on the inner side only, on both the inner and outer sides and on the outer side only; right panels: 3D views of p-CENP-AS7 (green) and CENP-A (red) signals. Scale bar = 1 µm. In total, 520 chromosomes from 3 independent experiments were scored and the percentages of chromosomes with p-CENP-AS7 on the inner and/or outer side of the centromere are indicated on the right. c CENP-A and p-CENP-AS7 localize to different domains on mitotic stretched chromatin fibers. Extended chromatin fibers were prepared from HeLa-S3 cells blocked in mitosis by overnight nocodazole treatment; CENP-A (red) and p-CENP-AS7 (green) signals on a representative centromere chromatin fiber are shown. The lower panel shows the profile of signals along the length of the fiber. Scale bar = 5 µm. d Only a small amount of CENP-A displays serine 7 phosphorylation during mitosis. HeLa cell lines stably expressing CENP-A-WT-HA and CENP-A-S7A-HA were left untreated (left panel) or were treated overnight with nocodazole (right panel). Protein extracts were separated on a 20% polyacrylamide (29:1 acrylamide/bisacylamide) gel and immunoblotted with an anti-HA antibody. The shift due to phosphorylation is indicated by an asterisk. Three independent experiments were performed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CENP-A-S7P is required for the protection of sister chromatid cohesion during mitosis. a After endogenous CENP-A siRNA depletion, metaphase chromosome spreads from CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A, or CENP-A-HA-S7D cell lines were immunostained with an anti-HA antibody. A × 9 magnification of a single chromosome is shown. Scale bar = 5 µm. b Mitotic cells displaying premature sister chromatid separation (PSCS) were quantified with two different clones from each cell line; at least 1000 cells were counted for each data point. The data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, one-way ANOVA)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Aurora A is involved in sister chromatid cohesion. a After transfection with a siRNA against Aurora A or Aurora B, chromosome spreads were prepared from HeLa-S3 cells and immunostained with anti-p-CENP-AS7 and CREST antibodies. A × 9 magnification of a single chromosome is shown. The relative fluorescence intensity of p-CENP-AS7 relative to CREST was determined and mean values ± SEM are shown on the bottom left side of the panel (n = 30 cells for control and Aurora-A RNAi and 20 cells for Aurora-B RNAi, from a representative experiment; ****P < 0.0001; *P < 0.1; NS, not significant; non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test). Bottom right panel: proportion of mitotic cells with PSCS (n = 4 experiments; > 200 cells per experiment were counted; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant; one-way ANOVA) are shown. b HeLa cells were treated with MLN8054 (Aurora A inhibitor). Aurora A inhibition was monitored by western blotting with an anti-p-Aurora-AT288 as a marker of the Aurora-A active form (top of the panel); chromosome spreads were then stained with CREST (red) and anti-p-CENP-AS7 (green) antibodies. A × 9 magnification of a single chromosome is shown. Scale bar = 5 µm. The fluorescence intensity of p-CENP-AS7 signals relative to CREST signals mean values ± SEM are shown on the bottom left side of the panel (n = 25 cells for a representative experiment; ****P < 0.0001; non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test). The mean ± SD of the percentage of cells displaying PSCS is shown on the bottom right of the panel (n = 3 experiments; > 200 cells per experiment were counted; ***P < 0.001; two-tailed unpaired parametric t test). c Following endogenous CENP-A siRNA depletion, CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A, or CENP-A-HA-S7D cell lines were treated for 1 h with 10 µM MLN8054 Aurora-A-specific inhibitor and then cytospun to determine the proportion of mitotic cell displaying PSCS. The data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments; at least 200 cells were counted per condition; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Aurora A localizes to the centromeres during mitosis. a Immunofluorescence microscopy on chromosome spreads, showing staining for Aurora A (green) and CREST (red) in HeLa cells transfected with control or Aurora-A siRNA. Images were overexposed to reveal weak signals. Magnifications (× 4.5) of chromosomes, and mean ± SEM quantifications of centromeric fluorescence signals for Aurora A are shown (n = 20 cells from a representative experiment; ****P < 0.0001; two-tailed unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test). b Immunofluorescence microscopy on chromosome spreads, showing staining for Aurora-A-GFP and CREST in U2OS cells stably expressing a GFP-tagged-Aurora-A. Magnifications of single chromosomes are shown. Scale bar = 5 µm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
CENP-AS7 phosphorylation is involved in sister chromatid cohesion and Sgo1 maintenance at centromeres in response to tension. a Chromosome spreads from CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A, and CENP-A-HA-S7D cells depleted of endogenous CENP-A were immunostained for Sgo1 and HA. Magnifications (× 9) are shown. In the CENP-A-HA-S7A cell line, the presence and absence of Sgo1 immunostaining at the centromere of joined (empty arrow) or separated sister chromatids (full arrow and asterisk), respectively, are shown. Scale bar = 5 µm. b CENP-A-HA-WT and CENP-A-HA-S7A cell lines were treated or not with nocodazole for 3 hours. The means ± SD of PSCS percentages are shown on the left (n = 2 experiments; > 150 cells per experiment were counted; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant; two-way ANOVA). Quantifications of Sgo1 in cell lines presenting joined or separated sister chromatids (SC) are shown on the right. The graph shows the means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = at least 22 cells; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; NS, not significant; non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test). c CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A and CENP-A-HA-S7D cell lines depleted from endogenous CENP-A were treated with 20 µM MG132 for 6 h and PSCS were scored. Means ± SD for the proportion of cells displaying PSCS are shown (n = 4 experiments; > 150 cells per experiment were counted; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; two-way ANOVA). d Means ± SEM from a representative experiment quantifying Sgo1 fluorescence intensity on joined or separated SC after the depletion of endogenous CENP-A in CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A, and CENP-A-HA-S7D cell lines further treated with 20 µM MG132 for 6 h (n = 23–26 cells, except for S7D with separated SC where n = 14; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.1; NS, not significant; non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test). e CENP-A-HA-WT and CENP-A-HA-S7A cell lines depleted from endogenous CENP-A and synchronized as indicated were scored for PSCS after 3 or 6 h following nocodazole or MG132 treatment. The means ± SD of PSCS percentages are shown on the left (n = 2 experiments; > 200 cells per experiment). Right panel: mitotic indexes (n = 2 experiments, > 400 cells per experiment)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Bub1 regulates CENP-AS7 phosphorylation and Aurora-A targeting at centromeres. ab HeLa cells depleted of Bub1 by siRNA were immunostained with anti-p-CENP-AS7 (a) or anti-Aurora-A (b) and CREST antibodies. Magnifications (× 9) of single chromosomes are shown. Means ± SEM are shown (on the right of the panel) for the quantification of signal intensity relative to CREST obtained with antibodies against p-CENP-AS7 or Aurora A antibodies in a representative experiment (for p-CENP-AS7 intensity, n = 20 cells in each condition; for Aurora A intensity, n = 25 cells in control and 20 cells in Bub1 RNAi conditions; ****P < 0.0001; two-tailed unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test). c Metaphase chromosome spreads from CENP-A-HA-WT, CENP-A-HA-S7A, and CENP-A-HA-S7D cell lines depleted of Bub1 were immunostained with antibodies against Bub1 and Sgo1. Scale bar = 5 µm. Inter-kinetochore distance means ± SEM of five to six representative cells with joined SC are shown (n = 10–50 chromosomes for each cell). Statistical analysis were performed on the mean of the distance measured for each cell (n = 5–6; ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis)

References

    1. McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:16–29. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blower MD, Sullivan BA, Karpen GH. Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:319–330. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00135-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunleavy EM, Almouzni G, Karpen GH. H3.3 is deposited at centromeres in S phase as a placeholder for newly assembled CENP-A in G(1) phase. Nucleus. 2011;2:146–157. doi: 10.4161/nucl.2.2.15211. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan BA, Karpen GH. Centromeric chromatin exhibits a histone modification pattern that is distinct from both euchromatin and heterochromatin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:1076–1083. doi: 10.1038/nsmb845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall OJ, Marshall AT, Choo KH. Three-dimensional localization of CENP-A suggests a complex higher order structure of centromeric chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:1193–1202. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200804078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources