Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 May 15;5(5):CD004829.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub4.

Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction

Irene Kwan  1 , Rui Wang, Emily Pearce, Siladitya Bhattacharya
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction

Irene Kwan et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Various methods of conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) have been used during oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction. The choice of agent has been influenced by the quality of sedation and analgesia and by concerns about possible detrimental effects on reproductive outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of different methods of conscious sedation and analgesia for pain relief and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval.

Search methods: We searched; the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL, and trials registers in November 2017. We also checked references, and contacted study authors for additional studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different methods and administrative protocols for conscious sedation and analgesia during oocyte retrieval.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, patient satisfaction, analgesic side effects, and postoperative complications.

Main results: We included 24 RCTs (3160 women) in five comparisons. We report the main comparisons below. Evidence quality was generally low or very low, mainly owing to poor reporting and imprecision.1. CSA versus other active interventions.All evidence for this comparison was of very low quality.CSA versus CSA plus acupuncture or electroacupunctureData show more effective intraoperative pain relief on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS) with CSA plus acupuncture (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.82, 62 women) or electroacupuncture (MD 3.00, 95% CI 2.23 to 3.77, 62 women).Data also show more effective postoperative pain relief (0 to 10 VAS) with CSA plus acupuncture (MD 0.60, 95% CI -0.10 to 1.30, 61 women) or electroacupuncture (MD 2.10, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.80, 61 women).Evidence was insufficient to show whether clinical pregnancy rates were different between CSA and CSA plus acupuncture (odds ratio (OR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.86, 61 women). CSA alone may be associated with fewer pregnancies than CSA plus electroacupuncture (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.66, 61 women).Evidence was insufficient to show whether rates of vomiting were different between CSA and CSA plus acupuncture (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.88, 62 women) or electroacupuncture (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.58, 62 women).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.CSA versus general anaesthesia Postoperative pain relief was greater in the CSA group (0 to 3 Likert: mean difference (MD) 1.9, 95% CI 2.24 to 1.56, one RCT, 50 women).Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.35, two RCTs, 108 women, I2 = 0%).Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in rates of vomiting (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.75, one RCT, 50 women) or airway obstruction (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.22, one RCT, 58 women). Fewer women needed mask ventilation in the CSA group (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.20, one RCT, 58 women).Evidence was also insufficient to show whether groups differed in satisfaction rates (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.11 to 4.04, two RCTs, 108 women, I2 = 34%; very low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for outcomes of interest.2. CSA + paracervical block (PCB) versus other interventions.CSA + PCB versus electroacupuncture + PCB Intraoperative pain scores were lower in the CSA + PCB group (0 to 10 VAS: MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.39, 781 women, I2 = 76%; low-quality evidence).Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.29, 783 women, I2 = 9%; low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.CSA + PCB versus general anaesthesiaEvidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in postoperative pain scores (0 to 10 VAS: MD 0.49, 95% CI -0.13 to 1.11, 50 women; very low-quality evidence).Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.26, 51 women; very low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.CSA + PCB versus spinal anaesthesiaPostoperative pain scores were higher in the CSA + PCB group (0 to 10 VAS: MD 1.02, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.56, 36 women; very low-quality evidence).Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.65, 38 women; very low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.CSA + PCB versus PCBEvidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.96, 150 women; low-quality evidence) or satisfaction (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.89, 150 women, low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.CSA + PCB versus CSA only Evidence was insufficient to show whether groups differed in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.36, one RCT, 100 women; very low-quality evidence). Rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting were lower in the CS + PCB group (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, two RCTs, 140 women, I2 = 40%; very low-quality evidence).Trialists provided no usable data for other outcomes of interest.

Authors' conclusions: The evidence does not support one particular method or technique over another in providing effective conscious sedation and analgesia for pain relief during and after oocyte retrieval. Simultaneous use of sedation combined with analgesia such as the opiates, further enhanced by paracervical block or acupuncture techniques, resulted in better pain relief than occurred with one modality alone. Evidence was insufficient to show conclusively whether any of the interventions influenced pregnancy rates. All techniques reviewed were associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Women's preferences and resource availability for choice of pain relief merit consideration in practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

IK, RW and EP have no conflicts to report.

SB has received support for travel and accommodation as invited speaker on topics unrelated to the current work.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Conscious sedation + analgesia (CSA) versus other active interventions, outcome: 2.2 Postoperative pain.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 3 Conscious sedation + paracervical block versus other interventions, outcome: 3.1 Intraoperative pain (VAS).
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 4 Patient‐controlled versus physician‐controlled sedation + analgesia (CSA), outcome: 4.1 Intraoperative pain score (VAS 0 to 10).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Ben‐Shlomo 1999 {published data only}
    1. Ben‐Shlomo I, Moskovich R, Katz Y, Shalev E. Midazolam/ketamine sedative combination compared with fentanyl/propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia for oocyte retrieval. Human Reproduction 1999;14(7):1757‐9. - PubMed
Bhattacharya 1997 {published data only}
    1. Bhattacharya S, MacLennan F, Hamilton MP, Templeton A. How effective is patient‐controlled analgesia? A randomized comparison of two protocols for pain relief during oocyte recovery. Human Reproduction 1997;12(7):1440‐2. - PubMed
Cook 1993 {published data only}
    1. Cook LB, Lockwood GG, Moore CM, Whitwam JG. True patient‐controlled sedation. Anaesthesia 1993;48(12):1039‐44. - PubMed
Coskun 2011 {published data only}
    1. Coskun D, Gunaydin B, Tas A, et al. A comparison of three different target‐controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target‐controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval. Clinics 2011;66(5):811‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Elnabtity 2017 {published data only}
    1. Elnabtity AM, Selim MF. A prospective randomized trial comparing dexmedetomidine and midazolam for conscious sedation during oocyte retrieval in an in vitro fertilization program. Anesthesia Essays and Researches 2017;11:34‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Gejervall 2005 {published data only}
    1. Gejervall AL, Stener‐Victorin E, Moller A, Janson PO, Werner C, Bergh C. Electro‐acupuncture versus conventional analgesia: a comparison of pain levels during oocyte aspiration and patients' experiences of well‐being after surgery. Human Reproduction 2005;20:728‐35. - PubMed
Guasch 2005 {published data only}
    1. Guasch E, Ardoy M, Cuadrado C, Gonzalez Gancedo P, Gonzalez A, Gilsanz F. [Comparison of 4 anesthetic techniques for in vitro fertilization]. [Spanish]. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion 2005;52:9‐18. - PubMed
Gunaydin 2007 {published data only}
    1. Gunaydin B, Ozulgen IK, Ozturk E, Tekgul ZT, Kaya K. Remifentanil versus remifentanil with paracervical block on plasma remifentanil concentrations and pulmonary function tests for transvaginal ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval. Journal of Opioid Management 2007;3:267‐72. - PubMed
Humaidan 2004 {published data only}
    1. Humaidan P, Stener‐Victorin E. Pain relief during oocyte retrieval with a new short duration electro‐acupuncture technique ‐ an alternative to conventional analgesic methods. Human Reproduction 2004;19(6):1367‐72. - PubMed
Lier 2014 {published data only}
    1. Lier M, Douwenga W, Yilmaz F, Schats R, Hompes P, Boer C, et al. Patient‐controlled remifentanil analgesia as alternative for pethidine with midazolam during oocyte retrieval in IVF/ICSI procedures: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Practice 2015;15(5):487‐95. - PubMed
Lok 2002 {published data only}
    1. Lok IH, Chan MTV, Chan DLW, Cheung LP, Haines CJ, Yuen PM. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient‐controlled sedation using propofol and alfentanil and physician‐administered sedation using diazepam and pethidine during transvaginal ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval. Human Reproduction 2002;17(8):2101‐6. - PubMed
Ma 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ma YY, Shen Y, Zhang LS, Qian YL, Chen XZ. [Comparison of midazolam and propofol as conscious sedation in oocyte retrieval of IVE‐ET]. [Chinese]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences) 2008;37:304‐7. - PubMed
Matsota 2012 {published data only}
    1. Matsota P, Sidiropoulou T, Batistaki C, Giannaris D, Pandazi A, Krepi H, et al. Analgesia with remifentanil versus anesthesia with propofol‐alfentanil for transvaginal oocyte retrieval: a randomized trial on their impact on in vitro fertilization outcome. Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology 2012;21(5):685‐92. - PubMed
Meng 2008 {published data only}
    1. Meng P, Wang LL, Xu B, Sun HX. [Application of acupuncture compound anesthesia in transvaginal ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval]. [Chinese]. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2008;28(6):451‐5. - PubMed
Meng 2009 {published data only}
    1. Meng P, Wang LL. [Analgesic effect of acupuncture compound anesthesia for patients of different pain thresholds]. [Chinese]. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2009;29(1):29‐31. - PubMed
Ng 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ng EH, Chui DK, Tang OS, Ho PC. Paracervical block with and without conscious sedation: a comparison of the pain levels during egg collection and the postoperative side effects. Fertility and Sterility 2001;75(4):711‐7. - PubMed
Ocal 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ocal P, Cepni I, Idil M, Akbas F, Aksu M. Analgesic effect of pethidine and piroksikam during oocyte aspiration: a comparative study. Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Dergisi 2002;88(3)16:230‐3.
Ozturk 2006 {published data only}
    1. Ozturk E, Gunaydin B, Karabacak O, Tuncer B, Erdem M, Erdem A, et al. Remifentanil infusion and paracervical block combination versus remifentanil infusion alone during in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2006;36:105‐11.
Ramsewak 1990 {published data only}
    1. Ramsewak SS, Kumar A, Welsby R, Mowforth A, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. Is analgesia required for transvaginal single‐follicle aspiration in in vitro fertilization? A double‐blind study. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 1990;7(2):103‐6. - PubMed
Sator‐Katzenschlager 2006 {published data only}
    1. Sator‐Katzenschlager SM, Wolfler MM, Kozek‐Langenecker SA, Sator K, Sator PG, Li B, et al. Auricular electro‐acupuncture as an additional perioperative analgesic method during oocyte aspiration in IVF treatment. Human Reproduction 2006;21:2114‐20. - PubMed
Stener‐Victorin 1999 {published data only}
    1. Stener‐Victorin E, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Wikland M, Janson PO. A prospective randomized study of electro‐acupuncture versus alfentanil as anaesthesia during oocyte aspiration in in‐vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1999;14(10):2480‐4. - PubMed
Stener‐Victorin 2003 {published data only}
    1. Stener‐Victorin E, Waldenstrom U, Wikland M, Nilsson L, Hagglund L, Lundeberg T. Electro‐acupuncture as a perioperative analgesic method and its effects on implantation rate and neuropeptide Y concentrations in follicular fluid. Human Reproduction 2003;18(7):1454‐60. - PubMed
Thompson 2000 {published data only}
    1. Thompson N, Murray S, MacLennan F, Ross JA, Tunstall ME, Hamilton MP, et al. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous versus inhalational analgesia during outpatient oocyte recovery. Anaesthesia 2000;55(8):770‐3. - PubMed
Zelcer 1992 {published data only}
    1. Zelcer J, White PF, Chester S, Paull JD, Molnar R. Intraoperative patient‐controlled analgesia: an alternative to physician administration during outpatient monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1992;75:41‐4. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Atashkhoii 2006 {published data only}
    1. Atashkhoii S, Abdollahi S, Farzadi L, Ghasemzadeh A. Conscious sedation with and without paracervical block for transvaginal ultrasonically guided egg collection. Human Reproduction 2006;21 Suppl:i135.
Bovenschen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Bovenschen JL, Lawrence KA, Abuzeid M, Jones ML, Achwal ML, Verril H, et al. Remifentanyl and fentanyl concentrations in follicular fluid during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2002;7(1):18‐23.
Bumen 2010 {published data only}
    1. Bumen S, Gunusen I, Firat V, Karaman S, Akdogan A, Tavmergen Goker EN. A comparison of intravenous general anesthesia and paracervical block for in vitro fertilization: effects on oocytes using the transvaginal technique. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2011;41(5):801‐8.
Casati 1999 {published data only}
    1. Casati A, Valentini G, Zangrillo A, Senatore R, Mello A, Airaghi B, et al. Anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: midazolam/remifentanil versus propofol/fentanyl regimens. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1999;16(11):773‐8. - PubMed
Corson 1994 {published data only}
    1. Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial B, Kelly M, Gutmann JN, Go KJ, et al. Is paracervical block anesthesia for oocyte retrieval effective?. Fertility and Sterility 1994;62(1):133‐6. - PubMed
Godoy 1993 {published data only}
    1. Godoy H, Erard P, Munck L, Camus M, Gepts E, Steirteghem AC, et al. Comparison of two local anaesthetics in transvaginal ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval. Human Reproduction 1993;8(7):1093‐7. - PubMed
Gotz 2014 {published data only}
    1. Gotz T, Kiddop DA, Motan T. Optimizing patient analgesic experience during in vitro fertilisation (Conference: 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, ASRM 2014 Honolulu, HI United States).. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2014; Vol. 102, issue 3:e132.
Hadimioglu 2002 {published data only}
    1. Hadimioglu N. Comparison of various sedation regimens for transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Fertility and Sterility 2002;78:648‐9. - PubMed
Hong 2005 {published data only}
    1. Hong JY, Jee YS, Luthardt FW. Comparison of conscious sedation for oocyte retrieval between low‐anxiety and high‐anxiety patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2005;17:549‐53. - PubMed
Manica 1993 {published data only}
    1. Manica VS, Bader AM, Fragneto R, Gilbertson L, Datta S. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: a comparison of 1.5% and 5% spinal lidocaine for ultrasonically guided oocyte retrieval. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1993;77(3):453‐6. - PubMed
Martin 1999 {published data only}
    1. Martin R, Tsen LC, Tzeng G, Hornstein MD, Datta S. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: the addition of fentanyl to 1.5% lidocaine. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1999;88(3):523‐6. - PubMed
Muir 1995 {published data only}
    1. Muir SE, Bowman MC, Mortimer D, Jansen RPS. Local xylocaine for transvaginal oocyte pick‐up: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Fertility Society of Australia/Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society. 1995:78.
Ng 1999 {published data only}
    1. Ng EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. A prospective, randomized, double‐blind and placebo‐controlled study to assess the efficacy of paracervical block in the pain relief during egg collection in IVF. Human Reproduction 1999;14(11):2783‐7. - PubMed
Ng 2000 {published data only}
    1. Ng EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. Comparison of two different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte collection in an IVF programme. Human Reproduction 2000;15(10):2148‐51. - PubMed
Ng 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ng EH, Miao B, Ho PC. Anxiolytic premedication reduces preoperative anxiety and pain during oocyte retrieval. A randomized double‐blinded placebo‐controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2002;17(5):1233‐8. - PubMed
Ng 2003 {published data only}
    1. Ng EH, Miao B, Ho PC. A randomized double‐blind study to compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte retrieval. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2003;20(1):8‐12. - PMC - PubMed
Oliveira 2016 {published data only}
    1. Oliveira G, Serralheiro FC, Fonseca F, Ribeiro O, Adami F, Christofolini D, et al. Randomized double‐blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound‐guided transvaginal follicular puncture. Einstein 2016;14(3):305‐10. - PMC - PubMed
Ongun 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ongun B, Ozornek MH, Ergin E, Karatekeli E. Prospective analysis of propofol versus midazolam for anaesthesia in oocyte retrieval (P‐346). Abstract of 18th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Vienna, Austria. 2002:120.
Ramzy 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ramzy AM I, Hefzy OA, Rhodes CA, Sattar MM, Al‐Wasseef MM, Serour G, et al. Ovarian sub‐capsular and vaginal needle site infiltration of local anaesthetic: evaluation of a novel method of pain relief after oocyte retrieval. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2001;6(2):169‐74.
Saleh 2012 {published data only}
    1. Saleh S, Elshmaa N, Ismail M. A comparison of two different regimens of total intravenous anesthesia for transvaginal ultrasound‐guided oocyte retrieval. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2012;17:256‐61.
Sarikaya 2011 {published data only}
    1. Sarikaya HB, Iyilikci L, Gulekli B, Posaci C, Erbil Dogan O, et al. Comparison of the effects of 2 different doses of remifentanil infusion for sedation during in‐vitro fertilization procedure. Saudi Medical Journal 2011;32(7):689‐94. - PubMed
Singh 2014 {published data only}
    1. Singh S, Dhaliwal LK, Jain K, Gainder S. Dexmedetomidine‐fentanyl versus pethidine‐promethazine for conscious sedation and analgesia during oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilisation (33rd Annual European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, ESRA Congress 2014 Seville Spain). Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. ESRA, 2014; Vol. 39, No 5, Suppl 1:E191.
Tsen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Tsen LC, Schultz R, Martin R, Datta S, Bader AM. Intrathecal low‐dose bupivacaine versus lidocaine for in vitro fertilization procedures. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2001;26(1):52‐6. - PubMed
Zaccabri 2001 {published data only}
    1. Zaccabri A, Fresson J, Denis E, Guillet‐May F, Barbarino P, Routiot T. Ponction ovarienne en fecondation in vitro: quelle analgesie?. Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite 2001;29:594‐8. - PubMed
Zhang 2013 {published data only}
    1. Zhang J, Wang X, Lu R. Analgesic effect of acupuncture at hegu (LI 4) on transvaginal oocyte retrieval with ultrasonography. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2013;33(3):294‐7. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Chen 2012 {published data only}
    1. Chen Q, Wei Q, Zhang X. Effects of electroacupuncture on supplementary analgesia and improvement of adverse reactions induced by dolantin in oocyte retrieval. [Chinese]. [Chinese] Zhongguo Zhenjiu 2012;32(12):1113‐6. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Kassira 2015 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Kassira S, Bates G, Powell M, Bouknight JM, McLean M. A randomized controlled trial of oral acetaminophen for analgesic control after transvaginal oocyte retrieval. (Conference: 71st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, ASRM 2015 Baltimore, MD, United States). Fertility and Sterility 2015; Vol. 104, issue 3:e181.

Additional references

ASA 2015
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Continuum of Depth of Sedation: Definition of General Anesthesia and Levels of Sedation/Analgesia. 2015. [ebook]. http://www.asahq.org/quality‐and‐practice‐management/standards‐and‐guide... (accessed 13 June 2017).
Bokhari 1999
    1. Bokhari A, Pollard BJ. Anaesthesia for assisted conception: a survey of UK practice. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1999;16:225‐30. - PubMed
Chumbley 1998
    1. Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P. Patient‐controlled analgesia: an assessment by 200 patients. Anaesthesia 1998;53(3):216‐21. - PubMed
Ditkoff 1997
    1. Ditkoff EC, Plumb J, Selick A, Sauer MV. Anesthesia practices in the United States common to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centers. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1997;14(3):145‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Elkington 2003
    1. Elkington NM, Kehoe J, Acharya U. Intravenous sedation in assisted conception unit: a UK survey. Human Fertility 2003;6:74‐6. - PubMed
Han 2011
    1. Han J. Acupuncture analgesia: areas of consensus and controversy. Pain 2011;152 (Suppl):S41‐S48. - PubMed
Hawkins 1993
    1. Hawkins R, Price K. The effects of an education video on patients' requests for postoperative pain relief. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 1993;10(4):32‐40. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane–handbook.org.
Rjosk 1993
    1. Rjosk HK, Haeske‐Seeberg H, Seeberg B, Kreuzer E. IVF and GIFT‐ Ergebnisse in Deuchland 1993. Fertilitaet 1995;11:48‐54.
Sharma 2015
    1. Sharma A, Borle A, Trikha A. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilisation. Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2015;5(2):62‐72.
Skelly 1996
    1. Skelly AM. Analgesia and sedation. In: Watkinson A, Adams A editor(s). Interventional Radiology. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1996:3‐11.
Stener‐Victorin 2005
    1. Stener‐Victorin E. The pain‐relieving effect of electro‐acupuncture and conventional medical analgesic methods during oocyte retrieval: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Human Reproduction 2005;20(2):339‐49. - PubMed
White 1987
    1. White DC. Anaesthesia: a privation of the senses. An historical introduction and some definitions. In: Rosen M, Lunn JN, editor(s). Conscious Awareness and Pain in General Anaesthesia. London: Butterworth & Co., 1987:1‐9.
Zhao 2008
    1. Zhao, Z. Neural mechanism underlying acupuncture analgesia. Progress in Neurobiology 2008;85(4):355‐75. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Kwan 2004
    1. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Knox F, McNeil A. Conscious sedation for oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilisation procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829] - DOI - PubMed
Kwan 2005
    1. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Knox F, McNeil A. Conscious sedation and analgesia for oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilisation procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Kwan 2013
    1. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Knox F, McNeil A. Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub3] - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources