Intraneural Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block: Minimum Effective Volume and Electrophysiologic Effects
- PMID: 29762181
- DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002254
Intraneural Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block: Minimum Effective Volume and Electrophysiologic Effects
Abstract
What we already know about this topic: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Both extra- and intraneural sciatic injection resulted in significant axonal nerve damage. This study aimed to establish the minimum effective volume of intraneural ropivacaine 1% for complete sensory-motor sciatic nerve block in 90% of patients, and related electrophysiologic variations.
Methods: Forty-seven consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients received an ultrasound-guided popliteal intraneural nerve block following the up-and-down biased coin design. The starting volume was 15 ml. Baseline, 5-week, and 6-month electrophysiologic tests were performed. Amplitude, latency, and velocity were evaluated. A follow-up telephone call at 6 months was also performed.
Results: The minimum effective volume of ropivacaine 1% in 90% of patients for complete sensory-motor sciatic nerve block resulted in 6.6 ml (95% CI, 6.4 to 6.7) with an onset time of 19 ± 12 min. Success rate was 98%. Baseline amplitude of action potential (mV) at ankle, fibula, malleolus, and popliteus were 8.4 ± 2.3, 7.1 ± 2.0, 15.4 ± 6.5, and 11.7 ± 5.1 respectively. They were significantly reduced at the fifth week (4.3 ± 2.1, 3.5 ± 1.8, 6.9 ± 3.7, and 5.2 ± 3.0) and at the sixth month (5.9 ± 2.3, 5.1 ± 2.1, 10.3 ± 4.0, and 7.5 ± 2.7) (P < 0.001 in all cases). Latency and velocity did not change from the baseline. No patient reported neurologic symptoms at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions: The intraneural ultrasound-guided popliteal local anesthetic injection significantly reduces the local anesthetic dose to achieve an effective sensory-motor block, decreasing the risk of systemic toxicity. Persistent electrophysiologic changes suggest possible axonal damage that will require further investigation.
Comment in
-
Intraneural Injection: Is the Jury Still Out?Anesthesiology. 2018 Aug;129(2):221-224. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002352. Anesthesiology. 2018. PMID: 29933286 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Intraneural Approach: Comment.Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1081. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002715. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090612 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Intraneural Approach: Comment.Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1082-1083. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002716. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090613 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Intraneural Approach: Comment.Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1083. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002717. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090614 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Intraneural Approach: Reply.Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1084-1085. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002718. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090615 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
