Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0195803.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195803. eCollection 2018.

Discovery of chitin in skeletons of non-verongiid Red Sea demosponges

Affiliations

Discovery of chitin in skeletons of non-verongiid Red Sea demosponges

Hermann Ehrlich et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Marine demosponges (Porifera: Demospongiae) are recognized as first metazoans which have developed over millions of years of evolution effective survival strategies based on unique metabolic pathways to produce both biologically active secondary metabolites and biopolymer-based stiff skeletons with 3D architecture. Up to date, among marine demosponges, only representatives of the Verongiida order have been known to synthetize biologically active substances as well as skeletons made of structural polysaccharide chitin. This work, to our knowledge, demonstrates for the first time that chitin is an important structural component within skeletons of non-verongiid demosponges Acarnus wolffgangi and Echinoclathria gibbosa collected in the Red Sea. Calcofluor white staining, FTIR and Raman analysis, ESI-MS, SEM, and fluorescence microscopy as well as a chitinase digestion assay were applied in order to confirm, with strong evidence, the finding of α-chitin in the skeleton of both species. We suggest that, the finding of chitin within these representatives of Poecilosclerida order is a promising step in the evaluation of these sponges as novel renewable sources for both biologically active metabolites and chitin, which are of prospective application for pharmacology and biomedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Current state of the art concerning distribution of chitin in the phylum porifera.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Specimens of A. wolffgangi (a) and E. gibbosa (c) in their natural environments. Washed with deionized water of the freeze-dried skeletons of A. wolffgangi (b) and E. gibbosa (d) which have been used for chitin isolation in this study.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Step-by-step scheme showing procedure for isolation of chitinous fibers from the skeletons of A. wolffgangi (left line) and E. gibbosa (right line).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Spicule-free, colorless 3D scaffold obtained from A. wolffgangii (a) and E. gibbosa (d) according to the isolation procedure represented in Fig 3. Microstructural features of selected skeletal fibers of A. wolffgangii (marked with arrows) (b) and E. gibbosa (e) prior and after HF-treatment (c and f, respectively) are well visible on the corresponding light microscopy images.
Fig 5
Fig 5
SEM imagery of the purified A. wolffgani (a) and E. gibbosa (d) skeleton’s fragments prior (b and e, respectively) and after demineralization procedure (c and f, respectively). Well visible spicules are marked with arrows.
Fig 6
Fig 6
Purified skeletal fibers of A. wolffgangi (a) and E. gibbiosa (c) after CFW staining observed in light microscopy (a, c) and fluorescence microscopy (b and d) modus, respectively.
Fig 7
Fig 7. FT-IR spectra of chitin isolated from A. wolffgangi and E. gibbosa demosponges in comparison with the of α-chitin standard.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Raman spectroscopy of the chitinous scaffolds isolated from A. wolffgangi and E. gibbosa demosponges in comparison with α-chitin standard.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Visualization of the chitinase digestion test using white light microscopy.
Chitinase digestion of purified and completely demineralized selected skeletal fiber isolated from A. wolffgangi and E. gibbosa prior (a and c, respectively) and after 3 h of chitinase treatment (b and d, respectively).
Fig 10
Fig 10
Comparative ESI-MS analyses from the glucosamine standard (a), and of the hydrolysed chitin from the A. wolffgangi (b) and E. gibbosa (c).
Fig 11
Fig 11. Schematic view of the possible uses of Poecilosclerida sponges including A. wolffgangi and E. gibbosa species.

References

    1. Merzendorfer H. The cellular basis of chitin synthesis in fungi and insects: Common principles and differences. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90: 759–769. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.04.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deguchi S, Tsujii K, Horikoshi K. In situ microscopic observation of chitin and fungal cells with chitinous cell walls in hydrothermal conditions. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 11907 doi: 10.1038/srep11907 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gow NAR, Latge J, Munro CA. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5: 1–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunner E, Richthammer P, Ehrlich H, Paasch S, Simon P, Ueberlein S, et al. Chitin-based organic networks: An integral part of cell wall biosilica in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Angew Chemie—Int Ed. 2011;48: 9724–9727. - PubMed
    1. Ehrlich H, Krautter M, Hanke T, Simon P, Knieb C, Heinemann S, et al. First evidence of the presence of chitin in skeletons of marine sponges. Part II. Glass sponges (Hexactinellida: Porifera). J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2007;308: 473–483. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21174 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources