Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 1;7(5):412-420.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.105.

What Factors Do Allied Health Take Into Account When Making Resource Allocation Decisions?

Affiliations

What Factors Do Allied Health Take Into Account When Making Resource Allocation Decisions?

Haylee Lane et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Allied health comprises multiple professional groups including dietetics, medical radiation practitioners, occupational therapists, optometrists and psychologists. Different to medical and nursing, Allied health are often organized in discipline specific departments and allocate budgets within these to provide services to a range of clinical areas. Little is known of how managers of allied health go about allocating these resources, the factors they consider when making these decisions, and the sources of information they rely upon. The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors that allied health consider when making resource allocation decisions and the sources of information they are based upon.

Methods: Four forums were conducted each consisting of case studies, a large group discussion and two hypothetical scenarios to elicit data. A thematic content analysis commenced during post-forum discussions of key factors by forum facilitators. These factors were then presented to an expert working party for further discussion and refinement. Transcripts were generated of all data recordings and a detailed thematic analysis was undertaken by one author to ensure coded data matched the initial thematic analysis.

Results: Twelve factors affecting the decision-making of allied health managers and clinicians were identified. One of these factors was disendorsed by the expert working party. The 11 remaining factors can be considered to be key decision-making principles that should be consistently applied to resource allocation. These principles were clustered into three overarching themes of readiness, impact and appropriateness.

Conclusion: Understanding these principles now means further research can be completed to more effectively integrate research evidence into health policy and service delivery, create partnerships among policy-makers, managers, service providers and researchers, and to provide support to answer difficult questions that policy-makers, managers and service providers face.

Keywords: Allied Health; Decision-making; Priority Setting; Resource Allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klein R. Dimensions of rationing: who should do what? BMJ. 1993;307(6899):309–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baeroe K. Priority setting in health care: on the relation between reasonable choices on the micro-level and the macro-level. Theor Med Bioeth. 2008;29(2):87–102. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9063-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams R, Jones A, Lefmann S, Sheppard L. Service Level Decision-making in Rural Physiotherapy: Development of Conceptual Models. Physiother Res Int. 2016;21(2):116–126. doi: 10.1002/pri.1627. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A Healthier Future for All Australians: Final Report June 2009. http://www.cotasa.org.au/cms_resources/documents/news/nhhrc_report.pdf. Accessed August 2016. Published 2009. - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann TC, Legare F, Simmons MB. et al. Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):35–39. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources