Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 May 15;38(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0293-0.

A novel nomogram individually predicting disease-specific survival after D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A novel nomogram individually predicting disease-specific survival after D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Wei Wang et al. Cancer Commun (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: Few studies have shown nomograms that may predict disease-specific survival (DSS) probability after curative D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), particularly among Chinese patients. This study sought to develop an elaborative nomogram that predicts long-term DSS for AGC in Chinese patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 6753 AGC patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2012 from three large medical hospitals in China. We assigned patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center to the training set, and patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital to two separate external validation sets. A multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression model in a training set, and a nomogram was constructed. Harrell's C-index was used to evaluate discrimination and calibration plots were used to validate similarities between survival probabilities predicted by the nomogram model and actual survival rates in two validation sets.

Results: The multivariate Cox regression model identified age, tumor size, location, Lauren classification, lymphatic/venous invasion, depth of invasion, and metastatic lymph node ratio as covariates associated with survival. In the training set, the nomogram exhibited superior discrimination power compared with the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification (Harrell's C-index, 0.82 vs. 0.74; P < 0.001). In two validation sets, the nomogram's discrimination power was also excellent relative to TNM classification (C-index, 0.83 vs. 0.75 and 0.81 vs. 0.74, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). After calibration, the nomogram produced survival predictions that corresponded closely with actual survival rate.

Conclusions: The established nomogram was able to predict 3-, 5-, and 10-year DSS probabilities for AGC patients. Validation revealed that this nomogram exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration capacity, suggesting its clinical utility.

Keywords: Advanced gastric cancer; Disease-specific survival; Prognostic nomogram.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for the study on patients with advanced gastric cancer according to inclusion and exclusion criteria in the SYSUCC, CMU, and TJMU, respectively. SYSUCC Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; CMU Chinese Medical University; TJMU Tianjin Medical University
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A nomogram predicting 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survival probabilities of patients after D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center training set. The nomogram is used by summing the points identified on the point scale for all variables. The total points projected on the bottom scales indicate the probabilities of 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Calibration of the nomogram in the CMU and TJMU validation sets. The x-axis represents nomogram-predicted survival probabilities, and the y-axis represents actual survival rates, with 95% confidential intervals measured by Kaplan–Meier analysis. All predictions lie within a 10% margin of error (within the dashed lines). ac represents the 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of the SYSUCC training set; df represents the 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of the CMU validation set; and gi represents the 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of the TJMU validation set. SYSUCC Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; CMU Chinese Medical University; TJMU Tianjin Medical University
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan-Meier curves according to quartiles of nomogram point. a SYSUCC; b CMU; c TJMU. SYSUCC Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; CMU Chinese Medical University; TJMU Tianjin Medical University

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH, et al. Nomogram predicting long-term survival after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(31):3834–3840. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang W, Li YF, Sun XW, et al. Prognosis of 980 patients with gastric cancer after surgical resection. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29(11):923–930. doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shiozaki H, Shimodaira Y, Elimova E, et al. Evolution of gastric surgery techniques and outcomes. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0134-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types