Cardiovascular phenotype and prognosis of patients with heart failure induced by cancer therapy
- PMID: 29764969
- PMCID: PMC7333864
- DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313234
Cardiovascular phenotype and prognosis of patients with heart failure induced by cancer therapy
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the clinical features, cardiac structure and function evaluated by echocardiography, cardiopulmonary response to exercise and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with heart failure (HF) induced by cancer therapy (CTHF) and heart failure not induced by cancer therapy (NCTHF).
Methods: We evaluated 75 patients with CTHF and 894 with NCTHF who underwent clinically indicated cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and followed these individuals for a median of 4.5 (3.0-5.8) years, during which 187 deaths and 256 composite events (death, heart transplantation and left ventricular (LV) assistant device implantation) occurred.
Results: Compared with NCTHF, patients with CTHF were younger, with lower prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, higher LV ejection fraction (LVEF), but similar global longitudinal strain. LV diastolic function (higher E/e' ratio) and compliance (higher end-diastolic pressure/LV end-diastolic volume index ratio) were worse in CTHF and were both associated with adverse outcomes. Despite a favourable clinical profile, peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope were similarly impaired in CTHF and NCTHF. In multivariable Cox regression analysis including clinical characteristics, cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables and LVEF, CTHF was associated with a significantly higher risk of death (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.53 to 4.55; p=0.001) and composite events (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.91; p=0.019) compared with NCTHF.
Conclusions: CTHF is characterised by a distinct clinical profile, better LVEF but worse LV diastolic properties, and similarly impaired global longitudinal strain, functional capacity and ventilatory efficiency. Accounting for differences in clinical characteristics, CTHF was associated with worse long-term prognosis than NCTHF.
Keywords: cancer; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; diastolic function; heart failure; strain.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: AMS reports receiving research support from Novartis and Bellerophron, and consulting fees from Philips Ultrasound. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures

Comment in
-
Heart failure resulting from cancer treatment: still serious but an opportunity for prevention.Heart. 2019 Jan;105(1):6-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313493. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Heart. 2019. PMID: 29973341 No abstract available.
References
-
- Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D, et al. ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the esc committee for Practice guidelines: the task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;2016:2768–801. - PubMed
-
- Oliveira GH, Qattan MY, al-Kindi S, et al. advanced heart failure therapies for patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:1050–8. - PubMed
-
- Yeh ET, Bickford CL. cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2231–47. - PubMed
-
- Mele D, Nardozza M, Spallarossa P, et al. current views on anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Heart Fail Rev 2016;21:621–34. - PubMed
-
- Mt Nolan, Russell DJ, Negishi K, et al. Meta-analysis of association between mediastinal radiotherapy and long-term heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2016;118:1685–91. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous