Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar 25:2018:1953636.
doi: 10.1155/2018/1953636. eCollection 2018.

Recent Progress of Fabrication of Cell Scaffold by Electrospinning Technique for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Affiliations
Review

Recent Progress of Fabrication of Cell Scaffold by Electrospinning Technique for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Yingge Zhou et al. Int J Biomater. .

Abstract

As a versatile nanofiber manufacturing technique, electrospinning has been widely employed for the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds. Since the structure of natural extracellular matrices varies substantially in different tissues, there has been growing awareness of the fact that the hierarchical 3D structure of scaffolds may affect intercellular interactions, material transportation, fluid flow, environmental stimulation, and so forth. Physical blending of the synthetic and natural polymers to form composite materials better mimics the composition and mechanical properties of natural tissues. Scaffolds with element gradient, such as growth factor gradient, have demonstrated good potentials to promote heterogeneous cell growth and differentiation. Compared to 2D scaffolds with limited thicknesses, 3D scaffolds have superior cell differentiation and development rate. The objective of this review paper is to review and discuss the recent trends of electrospinning strategies for cartilage tissue engineering, particularly the biomimetic, gradient, and 3D scaffolds, along with future prospects of potential clinical applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical electrospinning facility with a plate collector [6].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holzwarth J. M., Ma P. X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32(36):9622–9629. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan B. P., Leong K. W. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. European Spine Journal. 2008;17(4):S467–S479. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Brein F. J. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Today. 2011;14(3):88–95. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X. - DOI
    1. Carletti E., Motta A., Migliaresi C. Scaffolds for tissue engineering and 3D cell culture. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2011;695:17–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Izadifar Z., Chen X., Kulyk W. Strategic design and fabrication of engineered scaffolds for articular cartilage repair. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2012;3(4):799–838. doi: 10.3390/jfb3040799. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources