Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 6;43(2):e14.
doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e14. eCollection 2018 May.

Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Khaldoan H Alshaikh et al. Restor Dent Endod. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze previously published studies of the effects of dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents on the bonding of self-etch (SE) adhesives to dentin. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of the above-mentioned surface pretreatment methods on the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin.

Materials and methods: An electronic search was performed using the following databases: Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect. The online search was performed using the following keywords: 'dentin' or 'hypochlorous acid' or 'sodium hypochlorite' and 'self-etch adhesive.' The following categories were excluded during the assessment process: non-English articles, randomized clinical trials, case reports, animal studies, and review articles. The reviewed studies were subjected to meta-analysis to quantify the effect of the application time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) deproteinizing agents on bonding to dentin.

Results: Only 9 laboratory studies fit the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled average microtensile bond strength values to dentin pre-treated with deproteinizing agents (15.71 MPa) was significantly lower than those of the non-treated control group (20.94 MPa).

Conclusions: In light of the currently available scientific evidence, dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents does not enhance the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin. The HOCl deproteinizing agent exhibited minimal adverse effects on bonding to dentin in comparison with NaOCl solutions.

Keywords: Deproteinizing agents; Hypochlorous acid; Self-etch adhesives; Smear layer; Sodium hypochlorite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study selection procedure. GIC, glass ionomer cement; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite; μTBS, microtensile bond strength.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS of SE adhesives bonded to NaOCl/HOCl-treated dentin. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite; HOCl, hypochlorous acid; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl; B, 50 ppm HOCl; C, 1% NaOCl; D, 5% NaOCl; E, 806.02 mM NaOCl; F, 0.95 mM HOCl; G, 1.91 mM HOCl; H, 0.5% NaOCl.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-analysis results of μTBS for control groups. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; C, no dentin surface treatment was performed; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for SE adhesive bonded to NaOCl-treated dentin. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl; B, 1% NaOCl; C, 1% NaOCl; D, 806.02 mM NaOCl; E, 0.5% NaOCl.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for SE adhesive bonded to HOCl-treated dentin. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; HOCl, hypochlorous acid; CI, confidence interval; A, 50 ppm HOCl; B, 0.95 mM HOCl; C, 1.91 mM HOCl.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for 5 second dentin surface treatment with a deproteinizing agent. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl; B, 50 ppm HOCl; C, 806.02 mM NaOCl; D, 0.95 mM HOCl; E, 1.91mM HOCl.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for 30 second dentin surface treatment with a deproteinizing agent. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl; B, 50 ppm HOCl.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for one-step SE adhesive bonded to deproteinized dentin. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Meta-analysis results of the mean μTBS for two-step SE adhesive bonded to deproteinized dentin. μTBS, microtensile bond strength; SE, self-etch; CI, confidence interval; A, 6% NaOCl.

References

    1. Jourdan M, Gagne S, Dubois-Laurent C, Maghraoui M, Huet S, Suel A, Hamama L, Briard M, Peltier D, Geoffriau E. Carotenoid content and root color of cultivated carrot: a candidate-gene association study using an original broad unstructured population. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116674. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller SA, Forrest JL. Translating evidence-based decision making into practice: appraising and applying the evidence. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2009;9:164–182. - PubMed
    1. Fuentes V, Toledano M, Osorio R, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66:850–853. - PubMed
    1. Ritter AV, Eidson RS, Donovan TE. Dental caries: etiology, clinical characteristics, risk assessment, and management. In: Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV, editors. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. 6th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2013. pp. 41–88.
    1. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95–110. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources