As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma
- PMID: 29768147
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715275
As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma
Abstract
Background: Patients with mild asthma often rely on inhaled short-acting β2-agonists for symptom relief and have poor adherence to maintenance therapy. Another approach might be for patients to receive a fast-acting reliever plus an inhaled glucocorticoid component on an as-needed basis to address symptoms and exacerbation risk.
Methods: We conducted a 52-week, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients 12 years of age or older who had mild asthma and were eligible for treatment with regular inhaled glucocorticoids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive twice-daily placebo plus budesonide-formoterol (200 μg of budesonide and 6 μg of formoterol) used as needed or budesonide maintenance therapy with twice-daily budesonide (200 μg) plus terbutaline (0.5 mg) used as needed. The primary analysis compared budesonide-formoterol used as needed with budesonide maintenance therapy with regard to the annualized rate of severe exacerbations, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 1.2. Symptoms were assessed according to scores on the Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment).
Results: A total of 4215 patients underwent randomization, and 4176 (2089 in the budesonide-formoterol group and 2087 in the budesonide maintenance group) were included in the full analysis set. Budesonide-formoterol used as needed was noninferior to budesonide maintenance therapy for severe exacerbations; the annualized rate of severe exacerbations was 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.13) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.14), respectively (rate ratio, 0.97; upper one-sided 95% confidence limit, 1.16). The median daily metered dose of inhaled glucocorticoid was lower in the budesonide-formoterol group (66 μg) than in the budesonide maintenance group (267 μg). The time to the first exacerbation was similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.17). The change in ACQ-5 score showed a difference of 0.11 units (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.15) in favor of budesonide maintenance therapy.
Conclusions: In patients with mild asthma, budesonide-formoterol used as needed was noninferior to twice-daily budesonide with respect to the rate of severe asthma exacerbations during 52 weeks of treatment but was inferior in controlling symptoms. Patients in the budesonide-formoterol group had approximately one quarter of the inhaled glucocorticoid exposure of those in the budesonide maintenance group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SYGMA 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224157 .).
Comment in
-
On-Demand versus Maintenance Inhaled Treatment in Mild Asthma.N Engl J Med. 2018 May 17;378(20):1940-1942. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1802680. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29768146 No abstract available.
-
As-Needed Budesonide–Formoterol in Mild Asthma.N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 30;379(9):897-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1808073. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 30179392 No abstract available.
-
As-needed budesonide-formoterol was noninferior to maintenance budesonide for exacerbations in mild asthma.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):JC30. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2018-169-6-030. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30242403 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials