Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 May 16;13(1):110.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0831-0.

Single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape versus hook plate in the treatment of acute type V acromioclavicular dislocation: a retrospective analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape versus hook plate in the treatment of acute type V acromioclavicular dislocation: a retrospective analysis

Ying-Cheng Huang et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Here, we compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes between coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with Mersilene tape and hook plate for acute unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treatment.

Methods: We enrolled 49 patients with unstable acute AC dislocation who, between January 2010 and January 2014, underwent surgery with single CC suture fixation with Mersilene tape (M group, 25 cases) or clavicle hook plate (H group, 24 cases). In M and H groups, the average age was 43.7 (range 18-72) and 42.0 (range 17-84) years, the male to female ratio of each group was 15:20 and 19:5, and the injured side left to right ratio was 12:13 and 11:13, respectively. All patients were right-handed. We retrospectively compared the operation time, complication rate, visual analog scale (VAS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Oxford shoulder scores, and the radiographic outcomes based on reduction loss of CC distance on postoperative follow-up.

Results: No significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups in age (p = 0.709), gender (p = 0.217), time from injury to surgery (p = 0.863), and injured side (p = 1.000). The mean follow-up was 26.2 months (range 24-35 months). Nine cases of reduction loss (36%) and one of distal clavicle osteolysis (4%) were noted in the M group. CC distance improvement in the H group was significantly superior to that in the M group at 3 months (before hook plate removal, p < 0.001) and 12 months postoperatively (after hook plate removal, p = 0.004), while subacromial erosions were revealed in nine cases (37.5%) in the H group. No significant difference in operative time (p = 0.846), complication rate (p = 1.000), VAS (p = 0.199), mean UCLA shoulder rating scale (p = 0.353), and Oxford shoulder (p = 0.224) scores between the two groups.

Conclusions: Both hook plate and Mersilene tape fixations provided temporary stabilization of acute type V AC dislocation and yielded comparable clinical outcomes. The hook plate provided better maintenance of reduction of radiographic outcomes. CC suture fixation with Mersilene tape may serve as an alternative method of stabilization which provides acceptable outcome without the need of implant removal.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular dislocation; Coracoclavicular fixation; Hook plate; Loop suspensory fixation; Mersilene tape.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board (IRB) of Kaohsiung General Veterans Hospital approved this retrospective study, where the need of informed consent to participate was waived. The committee’s reference number is VGHKS17-CT5-02.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of participants in current analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Coracoclavicular (CC) suture fixation with Mersilene tape for a type V AC dislocation after motorcycle accident injury. a Preoperative plain radiograph. b 1-month postoperative plain radiograph. c Surgical technique illustration of suspensory sling fixation with Mersilene tape
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Coracoclavicular fixation with hook plate for a type V AC dislocation after motorcycle accident injury. a Preoperative plain radiograph. b 1-month postoperative plain radiograph
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The method of measurement for CC distance
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Reduction loss after coracoclavicular fixation with Mersilene tape. a Preoperative plain radiograph. b 1-month postoperative follow-up. c 6-month postoperative follow-up with reduction failure
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a Osteolysis was observed on the left distal clavicle after CC fixation with Mersilene tape (arrow). b Subacromial erosion at the stress concentration area (arrow) after CC fixation with hook plate
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Radiographic outcomes. The line chart illustrated the trend of CC distance of the M and H groups by postoperative follow-up time

References

    1. Willimon SC, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(1):116–122. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.02.1869. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbull JR. Acromioclavicular joint disorders. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(Suppl 4):S26–S32. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199804001-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Alviti F, Garofalo R, Miulli F, Padua R. Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: a lack of evidence. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(2):105–108. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0013-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duan X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Wang Z. Treatment of coracoid process fractures associated with acromioclavicular dislocation using clavicular hook plate and coracoid screws. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(2):e22–e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.09.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips AM, Smart C, Groom AF. Acromioclavicular dislocation: conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;353:10–17. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199808000-00003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms