Pelvic abscess drainage: outcome with factors affecting the clinical success
- PMID: 29770767
- PMCID: PMC5951203
- DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.16500
Pelvic abscess drainage: outcome with factors affecting the clinical success
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the success and complication rates of image-guided pelvic abscess drainage with emphasis on factors affecting the clinical success.
Methods: During a 7-year period, 185 pelvic abscesses were treated in 163 patients under ultrasonography and fluoroscopy (n=140) or computed tomography (n=45) guidance with transabdominal (n=107), transvaginal (n=39), transrectal (n=21) and transgluteal (n=18) approaches. Abscess characteristics (etiology, number, size, intrastructure, microbiological content, presence of fistula), patient demographics (age, sex, presence of malignancy, primary disease, antibiotic treatments), procedure-related factors (guidance method, access route, catheter size) and their effects on clinical success, complications, and duration of catheterization were statistically analyzed.
Results: Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 93.9%, respectively. Procedure-related mortality or major complications were not observed. Minor complications such as catheter dislodgement, obstruction, or kinking were detected in 6.7% of the patients. Clinical failure was observed in 10 patients (6.1%). Fistulization was observed in 14 abscesses. Fistulization extended the duration of catheter use (P < 0.001) and decreased the clinical success rate (P < 0.001). The presence of postoperative malignant, complex-multilocular abscesses, and fungus infection in the cavity extended catheter duration (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, and P = 0.007, respectively), whereas the presence of sterile abscess and endocavitary catheterization reduced the catheter duration (P = 0.009 and P = 0.011, respectively).
Conclusion: Image-guided pelvic abscess drainage has high clinical success and low complication rates. The only factor affecting the clinical success rate is the presence of fistula.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Men S, Akhan O, Koroglu M. Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscess. Eur J Radiol. 2002;43:204–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00156-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maher MM, Gervais DA, Kalra MK, et al. The inaccessible or undrainable abscess: How to drain it. Radiographics. 2004;24:717–735. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035100. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sudakoff GS, Lundeen SJ, Otterson MF. Transrectal and transvaginal sonographic intervention of infected pelvic fluid collections. Ultrasound Q. 2005;21:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ruq.0000174753.16708.7a. - DOI - PubMed
-
- McGahan JP, Wu C. Sonographically guided transvaginal or transrectal pelvic abscess drainage using the trocar method with a new drainage guide attachment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1540–1544. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3830. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harisinghani MG, Gervais DA, Maher MM. Transgluteal approach for percutaneous drainage of deep pelvic abscesses: 154 cases. Radiology. 2003;228:701–705. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283020924. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical