Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;21(14):2606-2616.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001234. Epub 2018 May 17.

Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition

Affiliations

Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition

Audrey Rankin et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The present study explored associations between food choice motives, attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition, to inform communication strategies based on consumer priorities and concerns.Design/SettingA survey was administered online which included the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) and items assessing attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

Subjects: Nationally representative samples were recruited in nine EU countries (n 9381).

Results: Structural equation modelling indicated that the food choice motives 'weight control', 'mood', 'health' and 'ethical concern' had a positive association and 'price' had a negative association with attitude towards, and intention to adopt, personalised nutrition. 'Health' was positively associated and 'familiarity' negatively associated with attitude towards personalised nutrition. The effects of 'weight control', 'ethical concern', 'mood' and 'price' on intention to adopt personalised nutrition were partially mediated by attitude. The effects of 'health' and 'familiarity' were fully mediated by attitude. 'Sensory appeal' was negatively and directly associated with intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

Conclusions: Personalised nutrition providers may benefit from taking into consideration the importance of underlying determinants of food choice in potential users, particularly weight control, mood and price, when promoting services and in tailoring communications that are motivationally relevant.

Keywords: Attitudes; Food Choices Questionnaire; Food choice motives; Food4Me; Intention; Nutrigenomics; Personalised nutrition; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standardised path coefficients for direct associations of food choice motives with attitude towards personalised nutrition (PN) and intention to adopt PN (Model VI) in Poland. *P<0·01, **P<0·001 (SA, sensory appeal; WC, weight control; Fam, familiarity; EC, ethical concern)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gibney MJ & Walsh MC (2013) The future direction of personalised nutrition: my diet, my phenotype, my genes. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 219–225. - PubMed
    1. Hesketh J (2012) Personalised nutrition: how far has nutrigenomics progressed? Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 430–435. - PubMed
    1. Covolo L, Rubinelli S, Ceretti E et al.. (2015) Internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 17, e279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poínhos R, van der Lans IA, Rankin A et al.. (2014) Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries. PLoS One 9, e110614. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart-Knox B, Rankin A, Kuznesof S et al.. (2014) Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull? Proc Nutr Soc 74, 171–176. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources