Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1734-1745.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1472183. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

A multifaceted approach to RSV vaccination

Affiliations
Review

A multifaceted approach to RSV vaccination

Jorge C G Blanco et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the leading cause of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in infants, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In addition, RSV infections occur throughout different ages, thus, maintaining the virus in circulation, and increasing health risk to more susceptible populations such as infants, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. To date, there is no vaccine approved to prevent RSV infection or minimize symptoms of infection. Current clinical trials for vaccines against RSV are being carried out in four very different populations. There are vaccines that target two different pediatric populations, infants 2 to 6 month of age and seropositive children over 6 months of age, as well as women (non-pregnant or pregnant in their third trimester). There are vaccines that target adult and elderly populations. In this review, we will present and discuss RSV vaccine candidates currently in clinical trials. We will describe the preclinical studies instrumental for their advancement, with the goal of introducing new preclinical models that may more accurately predict the outcome of clinical vaccine studies.

Keywords: Cotton rat; RSV; maternal immunization; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
RSV vaccination of animals with passively transferred maternal RSV immunity. (A) Diagram of the experiment. Female cotton rats were primed by infection with RSV A/Long (105 pfu i.n.) or left unprimed. All females were set in breeding pairs 5 weeks after RSV infection, and on week 9, females began delivering pups. At 4 weeks of age, pups were vaccinated with live RSV i.m., or left unvaccinated (-). Four weeks later, serum was collected from each pup and animals were challenged with RSV i.n. Four days after infection, pups were euthanized for determination of lung and nose viral titers. (B) NA titers of 4-week old pups born to unprimed or primed mothers. Insert shows mothers' NA titers in sera collected before delivery, indicating that all primed mothers produced NA. (C) NA titers in sera obtained from pups born to naïve or RSV-primed mothers after i.m. vaccination with live RSV (samples collected at week 8 prior to RSV challenge). (D) Lung and nose viral titers measured in samples obtained from pups born to naïve or RSV-primed mothers after vaccination of pups with PBS (-), or live RSV i.m. All animals were challenged i.n. with RSV/A Long (105 pfu) and euthanized 4 days later. ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. *p<0.01. Data taken from reference.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Efficiency of protection against RSV in juvenile cotton rats born from vaccinated, unprimed or primed mothers. (A) Female cotton rats were separated into three groups. One group of females remained unprimed and unvaccinated (Group A) as a control. Another group was primed by infection with RSV i.n. and then vaccinated with live RSV i.m. two weeks after priming and boosted during pregnancy (Group B). The last group of females remained unprimed, but was vaccinated and boosted (Group C). Litters from mothers in each group were challenged 4 weeks after birth and euthanized on day 4 post-challenge. (B) Quantification of lung and nose viral titers in samples of RSV-challenged, 4-week old juvenile cotton rats. Bars represent the mean ± SE. The inhibitory effect on vaccination in seropositive mothers was evaluated by comparing litters born from mothers in Group B (primed) and Group C (unprimed). N = 13-25 pups per group. ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. *p < 0.01. Data taken from reference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson AJ, Snelling TL, Moore HC, Blyth CC. Advances in Vaccines to Prevent Viral Respiratory Illnesses in Children. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(6):523–31. doi:10.1007/s40272-017-0257-x. PMID:28808938. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson LJ. Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Semin Immunol. 2013;25(2):160–71. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2013.04.011. PMID:23778071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson LJ, Dormitzer PR, Nokes DJ, Rappuoli R, Roca A, Graham BS. Strategic priorities for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine development. Vaccine. 2013;31 Suppl 2, B209–215. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. August A, Glenn GM, Kpamegan E, Hickman SP, Jani D, Lu H, Fries LF. A Phase 2 randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of aluminum-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus F particle vaccine formulations in healthy women of childbearing age. Vaccine. 2017;35(30):3749–59. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.045. PMID:28579233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beran J, Lickliter JD, Schwarz TF, Johnson C, Chu L, Domachowske JB, Dieussaert I. Safety and immunogenicity of 3 formulations of an investigational respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in non-pregnant women: results from two phase II trials. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(10):1616–25. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy065. PMID:29401325. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources