Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 May 17;7(11):e009361.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009361.

Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mario Gaudino et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis was designed to assess whether center experience affects the short- and long-term results and the relative benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods and results: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify all articles reporting the outcome of BITA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The BITA center experience was gauged according to the percentage use of BITA in the institutional overall coronary artery bypass grafting population (%BITA). The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative stroke, deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs), and major postoperative adverse event. The rates of the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated after adjusting for %BITA. Primary and secondary outcomes were also compared between the BITA and the single internal thoracic artery arms in the adjusted studies. Meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of %BITA on the primary and secondary outcomes. Thirty-four studies (27 894 patients undergoing BITA) were included. In the pooled analysis, the incidence rate for long-term mortality was 2.83% (95% confidence interval, 2.21%-3.61%). %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with long-term mortality and the rate of DSWI. In the pairwise comparison, %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with the risk of long-term mortality and DSWI in the group undergoing BITA.

Conclusions: BITA series with higher %BITA report significantly lower long-term mortality and DSWI rate as well as higher long-term survival advantage and lower relative risk of DSWI in their BITA cohort. These findings suggest that a specific volume-outcome relationship exists for BITA grafting.

Keywords: CABG; bilateral internal thoracic artery; coronary artery bypass graft; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; experience; meta‐analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses flow chart. BITA indicates bilateral internal thoracic artery; SITA, single internal thoracic artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effect of the percentage of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) use on the long‐term mortality (expressed as incidence rate) according to the univariable (A) and multivariable (B) meta‐regressions. DM indicates diabetes mellitus; totCABG, total coronary artery bypass grafting.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of the percentage of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) use on the long‐term mortality (expressed as incident rate ratio) according to the univariable (A) and multivariable (B) meta‐regressions. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effect of the percentage of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) use on the pooled event rate of deep sternal wound infection by univariable (A) and multivariable (B) meta‐regressions. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effect of the percentage of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) use on the odds ratio of deep sternal wound infection by univariable (A) and multivariable (B) meta‐regressions. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; DM, diabetes mellitus.

References

    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137. - PubMed
    1. Lapar DJ, Mery CM, Kozower BD, Kern JA, Kron IL, Stukenborg GJ, Ailawadi G. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:854–863. - PubMed
    1. Kim LK, Looser P, Swaminathan RV, Minutello RM, Wong SC, Girardi L, Feldman DN. Outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States based on hospital volume, 2007 to 2011. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:1686–1692. - PubMed
    1. Catarino PA, Black E, Taggart DP. Why do UK cardiac surgeons not perform their first choice operation for coronary artery bypass graft? Heart. 2002;88:643–644. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources