Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 10:5:38-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.02.001. eCollection 2018 Apr.

Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France

N Kalampalikis  1 , M Doumergue  1 , S Zadeh  1 ; French Federation of CECOS
Affiliations

Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France

N Kalampalikis et al. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. .

Abstract

Gamete donation in Europe is not regulated by a common legal framework. Different laws regarding donor anonymity and remuneration exist in different countries. In France, gamete donation is characterized by a stable legal framework - the existing system of anonymous and non-remunerated donation remained unchanged following a period of public and parliamentary debate in 2011 - but little evidence is available concerning recipients' views and experiences of gamete donation. This article describes findings from a questionnaire completed individually by 714 heterosexual couple members undergoing a donor conception procedure at one of 20 national fertility centres in France. Participants were invited to report their attitudes towards the French legal framework, their perceptions of the anonymous donor, and their intentions to disclose donor conception to their child and to other people. The majority of respondents (93%) approved of the current legal framework. Participants indicated that they thought about the sperm donor in ways that emphasized his act of donation without describing him as a specific individual. A majority (71%) also stated that they intended to tell their child about their donor conception. Given that this is the largest nationwide study of French recipients of donor sperm, the findings make an important contribution to the research evidence currently available about prospective parents' perspectives in the increasingly uncommon context of donor anonymity in Europe.

Keywords: France; anonymity; assisted reproduction; disclosure; sperm donation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appleby J. Regulating the provision of donor information to donor-conceived children: is there room for improvement? In: Golombok S., Wilkinson S., editors. Regulating Reproductive Donation. Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 334–351.
    1. Baetens P., Devroey P., Camus M., Van Steirteghem A.C., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous donors. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:476–484. - PubMed
    1. Beeson D.R., Jennings P.K., Kramer W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum. Reprod. 2011;26:2415–2424. - PubMed
    1. Brewaeys A., de Bruyn J.K., Louwe L.A., Helmerhorst F.M. Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices. Hum. Reprod. 2005;20:820–824. - PubMed
    1. Brewayes A., Golombok S., Naaktgeboren N., de Bruyn J.K., Van Hall E.V. Donor Insemination: Dutch parent’s opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:1591–1597. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources