Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;42(11):3755-3764.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4672-0.

Defunctioning Stomas Result in Significantly More Short-Term Complications Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Affiliations

Defunctioning Stomas Result in Significantly More Short-Term Complications Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Andrew Emmanuel et al. World J Surg. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Studies suggest that defunctioning stomas reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage and urgent reoperations after anterior resection. Although the magnitude of benefit appears to be limited, there has been a trend in recent years towards routinely creating defunctioning stomas. However, little is known about post-operative complication rates in patients with and without a defunctioning stoma. We compared overall short-term post-operative complications after low anterior resection in patients managed with a defunctioning stoma to those managed without a stoma.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective low anterior resection of the rectum for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was overall 90-day post-operative complications.

Results: Two hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for low anterior resection. One hundred and forty (69%) had a primary defunctioning stoma created. 45% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Patients with a defunctioning stoma had significantly more complications (57.1 vs 34.9%, p = 0.003), were more likely to suffer multiple complications (17.9 vs 3.2%, p < 0.004) and had longer hospital stays (13.0 vs 6.9 days, p = 0.005) than those without a stoma. 19% experienced a stoma-related complication, 56% still had a stoma 1 year after their surgery, and 26% were left with a stoma at their last follow-up. Anastomotic leak rates were similar but there was a significantly higher reoperation rate among patients managed without a defunctioning stoma.

Conclusion: Patients selected to have a defunctioning stoma had an absolute increase of 22% in overall post-operative complications compared to those managed without a stoma. These findings support the more selective use of defunctioning stomas.

Study registration: Registered at www.researchregistry.com (UIN: researchregistry3412).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript do not have any financial disclosures or competing interests to declare.

References

    1. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership 2017. National Bowel Cancer Audit: Annual Report 2017. https://www.hqip.org.uk/resources/national-bowel-cancer-audit-annual-rep.... Accessed 6 Apr 2018
    1. Snijders HS, van den Broek CBM, Wouters MWJM, et al. An increasing use of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Is this the way to go? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:715–720. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutegård M, Boström P, Haapamäki M, et al. Current use of diverting stoma in anterior resection for cancer: population-based cohort study of total and partial mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:579–585. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2465-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, et al. Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006878.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gu W, Wu S. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s12957-014-0417-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed