Predicting pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following a statewide standing order, Indiana 2016
- PMID: 29778772
- PMCID: PMC6375076
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.032
Predicting pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following a statewide standing order, Indiana 2016
Abstract
Background: While naloxone, the overdose reversal medication, has been available for decades, factors associated with its availability through pharmacies remain unclear. Studies suggest that policy and pharmacist beliefs may impact availability. Indiana passed a standing order law for naloxone in 2015 to increase access to naloxone.
Objective: To identify factors associated with community pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following the enactment of a statewide naloxone standing order.
Methods: A 2016 cross-sectional census of Indiana community pharmacists was conducted following a naloxone standing order. Community, pharmacy, and pharmacist characteristics, and pharmacist attitudes about naloxone dispensing, access, and perceptions of the standing order were measured. Modified Poisson and binary logistic regression models attempted to predict naloxone stocking and dispensing, respectively.
Results: Over half (58.1%) of pharmacies stocked naloxone, yet 23.6% of pharmacists dispensed it. Most (72.5%) pharmacists believed the standing order would increase naloxone stocking, and 66.5% believed it would increase dispensing. Chain pharmacies were 3.2 times as likely to stock naloxone. Naloxone stocking was 1.6 times as likely in pharmacies with more than one full-time pharmacist. Pharmacies where pharmacists received naloxone continuing education in the past two years were 1.3 times as likely to stock naloxone. The attempted dispensing model yielded no improvement over the constant-only model.
Conclusions: Pharmacies with larger capacity took advantage of the naloxone standing order. Predictors of pharmacist naloxone dispensing should continue to be explored to maximize naloxone access.
Keywords: Naloxone access; Opioid overdose reversal; Pharmacy practice; Public health law.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interests to report.
References
-
- Agley J, Meyerson BE, Shannon DJ, Ryder PT, Ritchie K, Gassman RA, 2017. Using the hybrid method to survey U.S. pharmacists: applying lessons learned to leverage technology. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm 13, 250–252. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2017a. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States Continue to Increase in 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous