Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 8:11:2571-2579.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S159538. eCollection 2018.

Partial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy in bulky non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Partial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy in bulky non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Yun Bai et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: Bulky non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is difficult to achieve effective local control by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CRT). The present work aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of partial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy (P-SABR) in bulky NSCLC.

Patients and methods: From December 2012 through August 2017, 30 patients with bulky NSCLC treated with P-SABR technique were analyzed. The P-SABR plan consisted of one partial SABR plan (5-9 Gy/f, 3-6 fractions) to gross tumor boost (GTVb), followed by one CRT plan to the planning target volume (PTV). GTVb was the max volume receiving SABR to guarantee the dose of organs-at-risks (OARs) falloff to about 3 Gy/f. The total dose of PTV margin was planned to above 60 Gy. The simply CRT plans were created using the same planning parameters as the original plan, with the goal to achieve comparable OARs doses and PTV margin dose to the P-SABR plan. Dosimetric variables were acquired in both P-SABR and compared CRT plans. Toxicity, local control, and survival were also evaluated.

Results: Median follow-up in survivors was 10.3 months (range=2.3-39.4 months). Eleven patients (36.7%) had partial response (PR) and ten patients (33.3%) had stable disease (SD). Two-year overall survival was 55.6%. Two-year local control rate was 85.7%. No severe acute side effects >CTCAE Grade III were observed. Compared to the simply CRT plan, P-SABR plans achieved similar doses to the OARs and Dmin, but increased dose at the isocenter, Dmean, Dmax, and biological equivalent dose (BED) significantly (P<0.05). BED in the tumor center could reach 107.3 Gy (93.2-132 Gy). Patients with B90≥65% achieved a higher local control rate than those with B90<65% (P=0.010).

Conclusion: This retrospective study suggests that P-SABR is feasible and well tolerated in bulky NSCLC. Local control rate is encouraging, especially for the B90≥65% group, which may due to the ability of P-SABR to optimize BED with equivalent toxicity.

Keywords: NSCLC; P-SABR; bulky mass; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the P-SABR. The P-SABR plan combines a partial SABR boost plan and a CRT plan. (A) The SABR (5–9 Gy per fraction) was delivered to the max tumor volume, while the OAR dose fell off to 3 Gy/f. (B) The CRT component was delivered afterwards, ensuring the total PTV margin dose to about 64 Gy. Abbreviations: P-SABR, Partial Stereotactic Ablative Boost Radiotherapy; SABR, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy; CRT, Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy; OAR, Organs-At-Risk; PTV, Planning Target Volume.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival for all patients. One-year overall survival was 88.2%. Two-year overall survival was 55.6%. (B) Kaplan–Meier plots of local control for all patients. One-year local control rate was 100%. Two-year local control rate was 85.7%. (C) Patients with B90≥65% (n=19) achieved a higher local control rate than those with B90<65% (n=11) (median survival=15.2 months vs 3.5 months, CI=6.8–23.6 and 2.2–4.9 months, respectively; P=0.010). (D) Patients with B80≥90% (n=20) achieved a higher local control rate than those with B80<90% (n=10) (median survival=14.9 months vs 3.5 months, CI=3.4–26.3 and 1.8–5.2 months, respectively; P=0.045).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 56-year-old male with squamous cell cancer of the left lung (T3N2M0). Before (A) and 4 months (B), 7 months (C), and 18 months (D) after P-SABR (SABR plans: 6 Gy/f×4 f, CRT plans: 2.2 Gy/f×26 f→ Dose: GTVb 81.2 Gy/PTV 69.2 Gy/30 f). Abbreviations: P-SABR, Partial Stereotactic Ablative Boost Radiotherapy; SABR, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy; CRT, Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy; GTVb, Gross Tumor boost; PTV, Planning Target Volume.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The dose distribution curves of a P-SABR plan (A) and comparative CRT plan (B). The isodose lines, from outer to inner, represent 20, 30, 40, 50, 57.2, 60, 69.2, 75, 81.2, and 85 Gy, respectively. The DVH of this P-SABR plan (C) and comparative CRT plan (D). Detailed dosimetric results including P-values are described in Tables 4 and 5. Abbreviations: P-SABR, Partial Stereotactic Ablative Boost Radiotherapy; CRT, Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy; DVH, Dose Volume Histogram.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Dubben HH, Thames HD, Beck-Bornholdt HP. Tumor volume: a basic and specific response predictor in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998;47(2):167–174. - PubMed
    1. Werner-Wasik M, Swann RS, Bradley J, et al. Increasing tumor volume is predictive of poor overall and progression-free survival: secondary analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 93-11 phase I–II radiation dose-escalation study in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(2):385–390. - PubMed
    1. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C, et al. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(30):4833–4839. - PubMed
    1. Sampath S. Treatment: radiation therapy. Cancer Treat Res. 2016;170:105–118. - PubMed