Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 4:10:38-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.033. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Long-term visual outcomes of laser anterior ciliary excision

Affiliations

Long-term visual outcomes of laser anterior ciliary excision

AnnMarie Hipsley et al. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the long-term visual outcomes of six eyes of 3 patients up to 13 years following the Laser Anterior Ciliary Excision (LaserACE) procedure.

Methods: Three male patients of ages 59, 59, and 60 presented for evaluation at Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina at 8, 10, and 13 years after the LaserACE procedure for presbyopia, respectively. All 3 patients had a history of laser vision correction (LVC) prior to LaserACE treatment. Visual performance was evaluated using ray-tracing aberrometry, specifically higher-order aberrations, visual Strehl of the optical transfer function (VSOTF), depth of focus (DoF), and effective range of focus (EROF). VSOTF was computed as a function of defocus using a through-focus curve. Subjective DoF was overlaid on the VSOTF through-focus curve to establish the best image quality metric threshold value for correlation between subjective and objective DoF. EROF was determined by measuring the difference in diopters between the near and distance DoF curves, at 50% of VSOTF.

Results: Distance-corrected visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and distance-corrected near visual acuity for all patients remained at 20/20 or better up to 13 years postoperatively. EROF averaged 1.56 ± 0.36 (D) for all eyes.

Conclusions and importance: LaserACE provided improvement in near vision functionality in these LVC patients with long-term stability. The LaserACE procedure is not on the visual axis, therefore these patients could still receive correction to their hyperopic regression.

Keywords: Accommodation; Laser anterior ciliary excision; Presbyopia; Visual acuity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Laser Anterior Ciliary Excision (LaserACE) surgical technique. Photo A. Quadrant marker; B. Matrix marker; C. Corneal Shield; D. LaserACE micropore ablation; E. Subconjunctival Collagen F. Completed 4 quadrants. Reprinted with permission from Hipsley et al.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative photo of a postoperative Laser Anterior Ciliary Excision patient eye under a slit lamp.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative example of image quality metrics at near, distance, and the difference.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Determining objective accommodation using iTrace aberrometry. Objective accommodation (OA) is measured by determining the spherical equivalent of the difference between distance and near refraction. Examples shown for A. non-presbyopic eye (OA = 2.63 D); B. presbyopic eye (OA = 0.32 D).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effective range of focus. Visual Strehl ratio based upon the optical transfer function is computed as a function of defocus using a through-focus curve. Patient eye (OD): A. 101, B. 102, C. 103.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Effective range of focus. Visual Strehl ratio based upon the optical transfer function is computed as a function of defocus using a through-focus curve. Patient eye (OS): A. 101, B. 102, C. 103.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Refractive and wavefront difference maps at distance and near using ray-tracing. Maps show accommodation and pseudoaccommodation components. Patient eye (OD): 1 A. 101, B. 102, C. 103.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Refractive and wavefront difference maps at distance and near using ray-tracing. Maps show accommodation and pseudoaccommodation components. Patient eye (OS): A. 101, B. 102, C. 103.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Patient averages of depth of focus, effective range of focus, visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function, higher order aberrations: OD (black), OS (white), OU (gray).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holden B.A., Fricke T.R., Ho S.M. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1731–1739. - PubMed
    1. von Helmholtz H. Mechanism of accommodation. In: Southall J.P.C., editor. Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. vol. 1. Optical Society of America; Rochester, NY.: 1924. pp. 143–172. Trans. from the 3rd German Ed.
    1. Detorakis E.T., Pallikaris I.G. Ocular rigidity: biomechanical role, in vivo measurements and clinical significance. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41:73–81. - PubMed
    1. Croft M.A., McDonald J.P., Katz A., Lin T.-L., Lütjen-Drecoll E., Kaufman P.L. Extralenticular and lenticular aspects of accommodation and presbyopia in human versus monkey eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:5035–5048. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croft M.A., Nork T.M., McDonald J.P., Katz A., Lütjen-Drecoll E., Kaufman P.L. Accommodative movements of the vitreous membrane, choroid, and sclera in young and presbyopic human and nonhuman primate eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:5049–5058. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources