Hospitalization metrics associated with hospital-level variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization for patients with venous thromboembolism in the United States: Implications for quality of care
- PMID: 29781388
- DOI: 10.1177/1358863X18768685
Hospitalization metrics associated with hospital-level variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization for patients with venous thromboembolism in the United States: Implications for quality of care
Abstract
Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) across hospitals has been observed, suggesting differences in quality of care. Hospitalization metrics associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients have not been compared based on IVCF utilization rates using a national sample. We conducted a descriptive retrospective study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to delineate the variability of hospitalization metrics across the hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization for VTE patients. The NRD included all-payer administrative inpatient records drawn from 22 states. Adult (≥ 18 years) patients with VTE hospitalizations with or without IVCF were identified from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 and hospitals were divided into quartiles based on the IVCF utilization rate as a proportion of VTE patients. Primary outcome measures were observed rates of in-hospital mortality, 30-day all-cause readmissions and VTE-related readmissions, cost, and length of stay. Patient case-mix characteristics and hospital-level factors by hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization rates, were compared. Overall, 12.29% of VTE patients had IVCF placement, with IVCF utilization ranging from 0% to 46.84%. The highest quartile had fewer pulmonary embolism patients relative to deep vein thrombosis patients, and older patient ages were present in higher quartiles. The highest quartile of hospitals placing IVCFs were more often private, for-profit, and non-teaching. Patient and hospital characteristics and hospitalization metrics varied by IVCF utilization rates, but hospitalization outcomes for non-IVCF patients varied most between quartiles. Future work investigating the implications of IVCF utilization rates as a measure of quality of care for VTE patients is needed.
Keywords: hospitalization; inferior vena cava (IVC) filters; quality of care; venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Similar articles
-
Updated Trends in Inferior Vena Cava Filter Use by Indication in the United States After Food and Drug Administration Safety Warnings: A Decade Analysis From 2010 to 2019.J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):873-881. doi: 10.1177/15266028231156089. Epub 2023 Mar 1. J Endovasc Ther. 2024. PMID: 36859812
-
Evaluating the Utilization of Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Trauma Patients.Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 7. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 28890064
-
A survey of vascular specialists' practice patterns of inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval.Vascular. 2019 Jun;27(3):291-298. doi: 10.1177/1708538118815394. Epub 2018 Dec 1. Vascular. 2019. PMID: 30501583
-
A Review of Interventions to Increase Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates.Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:284-297. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Apr 13. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29655810 Review.
-
Appropriateness guidelines for inferior vena cava filter utilization: A contemporary review.Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):164-178. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Semin Vasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 39151996 Review.
Cited by
-
Age-related differences in risks and outcomes of 30-day readmission in adults with sickle cell disease.Ann Hematol. 2023 Sep;102(9):2329-2342. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05365-5. Epub 2023 Jul 14. Ann Hematol. 2023. PMID: 37450055
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources