Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May-Jun;20(94):90-100.
doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_59_17.

Railway noise annoyance on the railway track in northwest slovakia

Affiliations

Railway noise annoyance on the railway track in northwest slovakia

Alzbeta Pultznerova et al. Noise Health. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: This paper describes an assessment of noise caused by railway traffic in a large high-loaded railway track in Northwest Slovakia.

Materials and methods: The measurements of noise levels generated by trains passing through residential neighborhoods were taken. Noise maps were also calculated showing noise pollution generated by the train traffic. In addition, the annoyance level and sleep disturbance of residents affected by railway noise were evaluated by a validated questionnaire on a pilot sample of 107 respondents living near the important railway track.

Results: The measurements indicated that the noise levels generated by the passage of the train were extremely high especially at night, clearly exceeding the nighttime limits of equivalent sound pressure level established by the Decree of the Slovak Ministry of Health (No.549/2007) (LAeq = 55 dB). Measurements at one point during the night exceeded the limit values of up to 17.4 dB. The residents reported feeling affected by the noise generated by passing trains, which caused irritability, headache, poor concentration, and insomnia. In addition, 19.64% of the residents claimed that nocturnal noise pollution was the most distressing. The results of bivariate analysis showed a higher risk of annoyance especially for railway noise [ORMH = 7.80 (4.02-15.14)] and the noise from industry [ORMH = 3.08 (1.72-5.50)] in the exposed location.

Discussion: The effects of railway traffic on annoyance/sleep and psychosocial well-being were evaluated in a few studies. In accordance with our results the railway noise mostly disturbs sleep and rest of the respondents.

Conclusion: The pilot survey showed the importance of sleep and rest disturbance by railway noise and the possibilities of getting worse health condition in the future. Noise abatement measures and strategies should, therefore, be implemented in an effective and manageable way increasing the environmental advantages of rail transport.

Keywords: Noise annoyance; noise measurements; railway tracks; railway traffic; sleep disturbance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Share of EU population affected by railway noise LDEN > 55 dB. Adapted from the source: Reducing railway noise pollution, 2012, p. 18[10]
Figure 2
Figure 2
EU rail freight corridors in Slovakia. Adapted from the source: Railways of the Slovak Republic (ZSR)[17]
Figure 3
Figure 3
An example of a detailed record of noise tracking measurements on the railway track
Figure 4
Figure 4
An example of the 1/3 octave spectrum of the train passage — Os 3913, LAeq=90.9 dB

References

    1. European Environment Agency. Noise in Europe 2014. EEA Report 10/2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2014.
    1. Murphy E, King EA. Environmental Noise Pollution. Noise Mapping, Public Health, and Policy. 1st ed. Burlington: Elsevier; 2014.
    1. de Vos P. Railway Noise in Europe. State of the Art Report. Paris: International Union of Railways (UIC); 2016.
    1. de Vos P. How the money machine may help to reduce railway noise in Europe. J Sound Vib. 2003;267:439–45.
    1. Hänninen O, Knol AB, Jantunen M, Lim TA, Conrad A, Rappolder M, et al. Environmental burden of disease in Europe: Assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:439–46. - PMC - PubMed