Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan-Feb;8(1):50-57.
doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_11_18.

A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel franseen needle and a conventional end-cut type needle

Affiliations

A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel franseen needle and a conventional end-cut type needle

Shuntaro Mukai et al. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recently, a 22G Franseen needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with three novel symmetric heels has been developed to adequately obtain a core tissue.

Methods: All 38 consecutive patients with pancreatic masses who underwent EUS-FNB using a Franseen needle were investigated retrospectively to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNB using the Franseen needle. Then, the EUS-FNB outcomes and histological assessments of the tissue obtained by EUS-FNB using the Franseen needle and EUS-FNA using the conventional end-cut type needle for each of the 30 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases were compared.

Results: An accurate histological diagnosis of the Franseen needle was achieved with a mean of 2 passes in 97.4% of patients. Although the accurate histological diagnosis rate of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was not significantly different (96.7% vs. 93.3%, P = 0.55), the mean number of passes in the Franseen needle was significantly less than that in the conventional needle (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). The presence of desmoplastic fibrosis with neoplastic cellular elements and venous invasion were significantly higher (96.7% vs. 40.0%, P < 0.001 and 23.3% vs. 0%, P < 0.01, respectively) and the amount of obtained tissue was significantly larger with the Franseen needle (2.13 mm2 vs. 0.45 mm2, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: EUS-FNB using the Franseen needle enables the acquisition of a larger amount of tissue sample and achieves an accurate histological diagnosis with a smaller number of passes than the conventional end-cut type needle.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle biopsy; histology; pancreatic cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Upper needle: A conventional 22G end-cut type needle with beveled tips. Lower needle: A novel 22-guage Franseen needle with 3 symmetric heels (Courtesy of Boston Scientific Corp.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three large tissue clots were selected in a slide, and the area of the tissue clot was calculated by measuring the major axis and the minor axis (H and E, ×20)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot of the amount of obtained tissues evaluated by the total area of the 3 tissue clots for EUS-FNAB using each needle
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) A small amount of fragmented adenocarcinoma cell clusters obtained using a conventional end-cut type needle (H and E, ×100), which is difficult to differentiate from contaminated gastric foveolar epithelium. The evaluation of invasive growth is impossible based on this section. (b) A core tissue including the desmoplastic fibrosis with neoplastic cellular elements obtained using a novel Franseen needle (H and E, ×100). Destructive invasion growth is apparent, leading to an accurate diagnosis for malignancy
Figure 5
Figure 5
A large amount of core tissue including the venous, lymphatic, or nerve invasion, which helps a pathologist to make a definitive pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. (a) Venous invasion of adenocarcinoma evaluated by elastic Van Gieson staining (×200). (b) Lymphatic invasion of adenocarcinoma evaluated by immunohistochemical assessment of D2-40 (×200). (c) Nerve invasion evaluated by immunohistochemical assessment of S-100 (×200)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Obtained core tissue by EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle for lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis). (a) Storiform fibrosis (H and E, ×100). (b) Extensive infiltration of lymphocyte plasma cells (H and E, ×400). (c) Markedly increased numbers of IgG4-positive plasma cells (×400). (d) Obliterative phlebitis evaluated by elastic van Gieson staining (×200)

References

    1. Binmoeller KF, Thul R, Rathod V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, 18-gauge, fine needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas using a 2.8 mm channel convex array echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:121–7. - PubMed
    1. Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, Itokawa F, et al. Histological diagnosis by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic solid masses without on-site cytopathologist: A single-center experience. Dig Endosc. 2011;23(Suppl 1):34–8. - PubMed
    1. Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: An evidence-based approach (with videos) Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:939–59. e7. - PubMed
    1. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing proCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–49. - PubMed
    1. Huang JY, Chang KJ. Improvements and innovations in endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:E37–46. - PubMed