Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197352.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197352. eCollection 2018.

Which antiarrhythmic drug to choose after electrical cardioversion: A study on non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients

Affiliations

Which antiarrhythmic drug to choose after electrical cardioversion: A study on non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients

Hye Bin Gwag et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The relative efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) after electrical cardioversion are not well established. This study aimed to investigate the efficacies of different AADs for maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) after electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF). We selected patients from a retrospective registry including patients admitted for cardioversion between January 2012 and June 2016. The primary outcome was time to AF recurrence during the first year after cardioversion. The secondary outcomes included AF recurrence within 1 month, and first readmission due to heart failure, stroke, or additional non-pharmacological rhythm control. A total of 265 patients were divided into the 4 groups according to AAD type: flecainide (n = 33), propafenone (n = 64), amiodarone (n = 128), and dronedarone (n = 40). During the first year after cardioversion, the AF recurrence-free survival was similar between all AAD groups (69.7% vs. 67.2% vs. 71.9% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.439). About half of all recurrences occurred during the first month. There was no difference in any of the secondary outcomes, although the amiodarone group showed a trend toward more non-pharmacological rhythm control. AAD type was not associated with recurrence in multivariate analysis. In this study, half of all patients received amiodarone after electrical cardioversion. Flecainide, propafenone, amiodarone, and dronedarone showed similar efficacies for maintaining SR after electrical cardioversion. Thus, it might be reasonable to reconsider amiodarone use after cardioversion, since it did not show superior efficacy to the other drugs considered and is associated with potential side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study population.
AAD indicates antiarrhythmic drug; ECG, electrocardiogram; MS, mitral stenosis; MVR, mitral valve replacement; PMV, percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty. AADs in the grey box were included in the final analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for recurrence of atrial fibrillation during the first year after electrical cardioversion according to antiarrhythmic drug type.
AF indicates atrial fibrillation; AAD, antiarrhythmic drug. P value as calculated by the log-rank test between the 4 AAD groups. ‘No AAD group’ is shown for reference only.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Cox proportional hazards model for atrial fibrillation recurrence and additional rhythm control.
The dronedarone group was used as a reference group. Adjusted covariates included sex, cardiomyopathy, chronic obstructive lung disease, coronary artery disease, beta-blocker use, and left atrial volume index. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH. Randomized trial of rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation: the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (PIAF). Eur Heart J. 2001;22: 801–802. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2596 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saksena S, Slee A, Waldo AL, Freemantle N, Reynolds M, Rosenberg Y, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in the AFFIRM Trial (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management). An assessment of individual antiarrhythmic drug therapies compared with rate control with propensity score-matched analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58: 1975–1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagens VE, Vermeulen KM, TenVergert EM, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Bosker HA, Kamp O, et al. Rate control is more cost-effective than rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation—results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study. Eur Heart J. 2004;25: 1542–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schilling RJ. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Heart. 2010;96: 333–338. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.155812 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mouly S, Longas-Tejero MA, Bergmann JF. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007: CD005049 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub2 - DOI - PubMed

Substances