Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 May 22;8(5):e021078.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021078.

Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study

Alison B Rushton  1 , Martin L Verra  2 , Andrew Emms  3 , Nicola R Heneghan  1 , Deborah Falla  1 , Michael Reddington  4 , Ashley A Cole  5 , Paul Willems  6 , Lorin Benneker  7 , David Selvey  8 , Michael Hutton  9 , Martijn W Heymans  10 , J Bart Staal  11
Affiliations
Observational Study

Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study

Alison B Rushton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Potential predictors of poor outcome will be measured at baseline: (1) preoperatively to develop a clinical prediction model to predict which patients are likely to have favourable outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS) and (2) postoperatively to predict which patients are likely to have favourable long-term outcomes (to inform rehabilitation).

Methods and analysis: Prospective observational study with a defined episode inception of the point of surgery. Electronic data will be collected through the British Spine Registry and will include patient-reported outcome measures (eg, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire) and data items (eg, smoking status). Consecutive patients (≥18 years) undergoing LSFS for back and/or leg pain of degenerative cause will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria: LSFS for spinal fracture, inflammatory disease, malignancy, infection, deformity and revision surgery. 1000 participants will be recruited (n=600 prediction model development, n=400 internal validation derived model; planning 10 events per candidate prognostic factor). The outcome being predicted is an individual's absolute risk of poor outcome (disability and pain) at 6 weeks (objective 1) and 12 months postsurgery (objective 2). Disability and pain will be measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and severity of pain in the previous week with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10), respectively. Good outcome is defined as a change of 1.7 on the NRS for pain, and a change of 14.3 on the ODI. Both linear and logistic (to dichotomise outcome into low and high risk) multivariable regression models will be fitted and mean differences or ORs for each candidate predictive factor reported. Internal validation of the derived model will use a further set of British Spine Registry data. External validation will be geographical using two spinal registries in The Netherlands and Switzerland.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval (University of Birmingham ERN_17-0446A). Dissemination through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

Keywords: back pain; clinical prediction model; lumbar spinal fusion; rehabilitation medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. NICE. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management, NICE guideline [NG59]. UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Macki M, et al. Lumbar fusion versus nonoperative management for treatment of discogenic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:297–304. 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000072 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu C, Zhang GL, Yang CY, et al. [Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation accompanying with lumbar instability with internal fixation and spinal fusion]. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2009;22:755. - PubMed
    1. Ong KL, Auerbach JD, Lau E, et al. Perioperative outcomes, complications, and costs associated with lumbar spinal fusion in older patients with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E5 10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS1440 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willems P, de Bie R, Oner C, et al. Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000391 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000391 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types