Effect of CT window settings on size measurements of the solid component in subsolid nodules: evaluation of prediction efficacy of the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 29791206
- PMCID: PMC6209492
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180251
Effect of CT window settings on size measurements of the solid component in subsolid nodules: evaluation of prediction efficacy of the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma
Abstract
To investigate the predictive value of size measurements of the solid components in pulmonary subsolid nodules with different CT window settings and to evaluate the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: The preoperative chest CT images and pathological data of 125 patients were retrospectively evaluated. The analysis included 127 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas that manifested as subsolid nodules. All subsolid nodules were divided into two groups: 69 in group A, including 22 adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS) and 47 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA); 58 in group B that included invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPA). The size of the solid component in the pulmonary subsolid nodules were calculated in one dimensional, two dimensional and three dimensional views using lung and mediastinal windows that were recorded as 1D-SCLW, 2D-SCLW, 3D-SCLW, 1D-SCMW, 2D-SCMW and 3D-SCMW, respectively. Furthermore, the volume of solid component with a threshold of -300HU was measured using lung window (3D-SCT). All the quantitative features were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the significant predictor of the degree of pathological malignancy. Results: The 1D-SCLW, 2D-SCLW, 3D-SCLW, 1D-SCMW, 2D-SCMW, 3D-SCMW and 3D-SCT views of group B were significantly larger than those of group A (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that 3D-SCT (OR = 1.018, 95%CI: 1.005 ~ 1.03, p <0.05=was the independent predictive factor. The larger SCT was significantly associated with IPAs. Conclusion: 3D-SCT of subsolid nodules during preoperative CT can be used to predict the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma, which may provide a more objective and convenient selection criterion for clinical application. Advances in knowledge: Applying threshold of -300 HU with lung window setting would be better than other window setting for the evaluation of solid component in subsolid nodules. Computer-aided volumetry of the solid component in subsolid nodules can more accurately predict the degree of pathological malignancy than the other dimensional measurements.
Figures
References
-
- Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, Beasley MB, Detterbeck F, Flieder DB, et al. . . The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for coding T categories for subsolid nodules and assessment of tumor size in part-solid tumors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 1204–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lee KH, Goo JM, Park SJ, Wi JY, Chung DH, Go H, et al. . Correlation between the size of the solid component on thin-section CT and the invasive component on pathology in small lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9: 74–82. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000019 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Saji H, Matsubayashi J, Akata S, Shimada Y, Kato Y, Kudo Y, et al. . Correlation between whole tumor size and solid component size on high-resolution computed tomography in the prediction of the degree of pathologic malignancy and the prognostic outcome in primary lung adenocarcinoma. Acta Radiol 2015; 56: 17–32. doi: 10.1177/0284185114554823 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maeyashiki T, Suzuki K, Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, Oh S. The size of consolidation on thin-section computed tomography is a better predictor of survival than the maximum tumour dimension in resectable lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: 915–8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs516 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
