Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2018:52:60.
doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000144. Epub 2018 May 17.

Multifactorial intervention for diabetes control among older users of insulin

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Multifactorial intervention for diabetes control among older users of insulin

Rafael Vaz Machry et al. Rev Saude Publica. 2018.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if the closer follow-up with the supply of insulin pens and the measurement of capillary blood glucose improve the management of older patients with type 2 diabetes without adequate glycemic control despite extensive therapy.

Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, quasi-experimental study. We have included 45 patients over 60 years old, from both sexes, with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 8.5% using oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin. The intervention consisted of monthly medical visits, with the provision of insulin pens and strips for blood glucose measurement. All patients received insulin pen, refills of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn and regular insulin, needles for the pen, blood glucose meter, and capillary blood glucose tests (three tests/day). Treatment was adjusted with the same endocrinologist monthly for six months. Glycated hemoglobin was measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks after intervention.

Results: Glycated hemoglobin at baseline was 10.34% (SE = 0.22%) and 8.54% (SE = 0.24%, p < 0.001) and 8.09% (SE = 0.21%, p < 0.001) at 12 and 24 weeks after intervention, respectively, with a significant reduction from baseline.

Conclusions: More frequent medical visits, with treatment inputs including the use of insulin pens and self-monitoring, have improved glycemic control (reduction of 2.25% in HbA1C, on average, at 24 weeks of follow-up). Our data support a change in the management and medical behavior of older patients with chronically decompensated diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean and standard error of glycated hemoglobin before, during, and after the intervention among older patients with uncontrolled TD2.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variation of body mass index and insulin use among older patients with type 2 diabetes without adequate control during follow-up. Mean of the body mass index and standard error (A). Mean of the daily prescribed units of insulin per kilogram of weight and standard error (B). Mean of the daily prescribed units of the ratio of regular to NPH insulin and standard error (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rates of adherence to insulin use, calculated by the mean of the ratio of used units/prescribed units and standard error.

References

    1. Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde Vigitel Brasil 2014: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico: estimativas sobre frequência e distribuição sociodemográfica de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas nas capitais dos 26 estados brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2014. Brasília (DF) 2015. [cited 2018 Jan 21]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2014.pdf.
    1. Viana LV, Leitão CB, Kramer CK, Zucatti ATN, Jezini DL, Felício J, et al. Poor glycaemic control in Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes attending the public healthcare system: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Factors associated with injection omission/non adherence in the Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(12):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01636.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandran A, Bonafede MK, Nigam S, Saltiel-Berzin R, Hirsch LJ, Lahue BJ. Adherence to insulin pen therapy is associated with reduction in healthcare costs among patients with yype 2 diabetes mellitus. [cited 2018 Jan 21];Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 8(3):148–158. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467016/pdf/ahdb-08-148.pdf. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramadanm WH, Khreis NA, Kabbara WK. Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:517–528. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S78225. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types