Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 May 23;22(1):133.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2055-4.

Effect of postoperative goal-directed therapy in cancer patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of postoperative goal-directed therapy in cancer patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis

Aline Rejane Muller Gerent et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) has been advocated in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that using cardiac index (CI)-guided GDHT in the postoperative period for patients undergoing high-risk surgery for cancer treatment would reduce 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

Methods: A randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial was performed in a tertiary oncology hospital. All adult patients undergoing high-risk cancer surgery who required intensive care unit admission were randomly allocated to a CI-guided GDHT group or to a usual care group. In the GDHT group, postoperative therapy aimed at CI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2 using fluids, inotropes and red blood cells during the first 8 postoperative hours. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality and severe postoperative complications during the hospital stay. A meta-analysis was also conducted including all randomized trials of postoperative GDHT published from 1966 to May 2017.

Results: A total of 128 patients (64 in each group) were randomized. The primary outcome occurred in 34 patients of the GDHT group and in 28 patients of the usual care group (53.1% vs 43.8%, absolute difference 9.4 (95% CI, - 7.8 to 25.8); p = 0.3). During the 8-h intervention period more patients in the GDHT group received dobutamine when compared to the usual care group (55% vs 16%, p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of nine randomized trials showed no differences in postoperative mortality (risk ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.59-1.23; p = 0.4; p for heterogeneity = 0.7; I2 = 0%) and in the overall complications rate (risk ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.08; p = 0.2; p for heterogeneity = 0.07; I2 = 48%), but a reduced hospital length of stay in the GDHT group (mean difference (MD) - 1.6; 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.46; p = 0.006; p for heterogeneity = 0.002; I2 = 74%).

Conclusions: CI-guided hemodynamic therapy in the first 8 postoperative hours does not reduce 30-day mortality and severe complications during hospital stay when compared to usual care in cancer patients undergoing high-risk surgery.

Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01946269 . Registered on 16 September 2013.

Keywords: Cancer; Goal-directed therapy; High-risk surgery; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (number 335/13). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or their legal surrogates prior to enrolment in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm of treatment in the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) group. ICU intensive care unit, SVI stroke volume index, RBC red blood cell, Ht hematocrit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study flow chart. GDHT goal-directed hemodynamic therapy, ITT intention-to-treat
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of a longest follow-up mortality, b overall complication rate and c hospital length of stay. M-H Mantel–Haenszel method, CI confidence interval, GD goal-directed, IV inverse variance method

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Almeida JP, Vincent JL, Galas FR, et al. Transfusion requirements in surgical oncology patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:29–38. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankar A, Beattie WS, Wijeysundera DN. How can we identify the high-risk patient? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:328–335. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000216. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tote SP, Grounds RM. Performing perioperative optimization of the high-risk surgical patient. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:4–11. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael102. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jhanji S, Vivian-Smith A, Lucena-Amaro S, Watson D, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM. Haemodynamic optimisation improves tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation after major surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14:R151. doi: 10.1186/cc9220. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010;14:R118. doi: 10.1186/cc9070. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources