Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jul;24(4):219-224.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.17528.

Combined transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization in BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Combined transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization in BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma

Rusi Zhang et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with TACE monotherapy in BCLC stage B HCC patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 150 BCLC stage B HCC patients who had received TACE monotherapy or TACE-MWA combination therapy in our hospital from March 2007 to April 2016. The patients were matched by propensity score at the ratio of 1:2 by optimal method. The median follow-up period was 16 months. The overall survival, tumor response and progression-free survival were compared between the two groups by Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test.

Results: Tumor response (complete or partial response or stable disease) rates at 6, 12, 18, 24 months were 55.5%, 37.3%, 21.3%, 15.8% for TACE group, and 74%, 47.8%, 35%, 31.8% for TACE-MWA group, respectively. The survival rates at 1, 3, 5 years were 77.5%, 42.1%, 21% for TACE group and 93.1%, 79%, 67.7% for TACE-MWA group, respectively. Compared with TACE group, the TACE-MWA group had significantly improved progression-free survival (P = 0.044) and overall survival (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: TACE-MWA combination therapy has better clinical effectiveness than TACE monotherapy in BCLC stage B patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection procedure.
Figure 2 a, b
Figure 2 a, b
Comparisons of the progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) of TACE and TACE-MWA groups.
Figure 3 a–d
Figure 3 a–d
Subgroup analysis: progression-free survival of tumor size ≤3 cm (a), overall survival of tumor size ≤3 cm (b), progression-free survival of tumor size >3 cm (c), overall survival of tumor size >3 cm (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379:1245–1255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:329–338. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:599–641. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forner A, Gilabert M, Bruix J, Raoul JL. Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:525–535. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:D4787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004787.pub2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types