Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):468-477.
doi: 10.1037/amp0000247.

Teamwork in the intensive care unit

Affiliations
Review

Teamwork in the intensive care unit

Jennifer N Ervin et al. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) provide care to the most severely ill hospitalized patients. Although ICUs increasingly rely on interprofessional teams to provide critical care, little about actual teamwork in this context is well understood. The ICU team is typically comprised of physicians or intensivists, clinical pharmacists, respiratory therapists, dieticians, bedside nurses, clinical psychologists, and clinicians-in-training. ICU teams are distinguished from other health care teams in that they are low in temporal stability, which can impede important team dynamics. Furthermore, ICU teams must work in physically and emotionally challenging environments. Our review of the literature reveals the importance of information sharing and decision-making processes, and identifies potential barriers to successful team performance, including the lack of effective conflict management and the presence of multiple and sometimes conflicting goals. Key knowledge gaps about ICU teams include the need for more actionable data linking ICU team structure to team functioning and patient-, family-, ICU-, and hospital-level outcomes. In particular, research is needed to better delineate and define the ICU team, identify additional psychosocial phenomena that impact ICU team performance, and address varying and often competing indicators of ICU team effectiveness as a multivariate and multilevel problem that requires better understanding of the independent effects and interdependencies between nested elements (i.e., hospitals, ICUs, and ICU teams). Ultimately, efforts to advance team-based care are essential for improving ICU performance, but more work is needed to develop actionable interventions that ensure that critically ill patients receive the best care possible. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alameddine M, Dainty KN, Deber R, & Sibbald WJB (2009). The intensive care unit work environment: Current challenges and recommendations for the future. Journal of Critical Care, 24, 243–248. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexanian JA, Kitto S, Rak KJ, & Reeves S (2015). Beyond the team: Understanding interprofessional work in two North American ICUs. Critical Care Medicine, 43, 1880–1886. doi:1097/CCM.00000000000000136 - PubMed
    1. Almoosa KF, Goldenhar LM, Puchalski J, Ying J, & Panos RJ (2010). Critical acre education during internal medicine residency: A national survey. Journal of Graduate Medicine Education, 2, 555–561. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-10-00023.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alspach G (2007). Critical care nurses as coworkers: Are our interactions nice or nasty? Critical Care Nurse, 27, 10–14. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez G, & Coiera E (2005). Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 791–796. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.017 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms