Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 30;285(1879):20180590.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0590.

Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Affiliations
Review

Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Jukka Juutilainen et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields have been classified as possibly carcinogenic, mainly based on rather consistent epidemiological findings suggesting a link between childhood leukaemia and 50-60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines. However, causality is not the only possible explanation for the epidemiological associations, as animal and in vitro experiments have provided only limited support for carcinogenic effects of ELF magnetic fields. Importantly, there is no generally accepted biophysical mechanism that could explain such effects. In this review, we discuss the possibility that carcinogenic effects are based on the radical pair mechanism (RPM), which seems to be involved in magnetoreception in birds and certain other animals, allowing navigation in the geomagnetic field. We review the current understanding of the RPM in magnetoreception, and discuss cryptochromes as the putative magnetosensitive molecules and their possible links to cancer-relevant biological processes. We then propose a hypothesis for explaining the link between ELF fields and childhood leukaemia, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence, and make proposals for further research.

Keywords: ELF magnetic fields; cancer; cryptochrome; genomic instability; radical pair mechanism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A simple radical pair reaction scheme. Reactant molecules, AB, are converted into products, C, via a short lived radical pair, [A•+ B•−], formed by the transfer of an electron from A to B (black arrow). The electron spins, one in each radical, can have either a singlet (red) or a triplet (blue) configuration. Singlet and triplet states differ in the relative orientation of the two spins: anti-parallel (singlet) or parallel (triplet). The red and blue arrows represent spin-selective chemical reactions: reversion of the singlet to AB by back electron transfer and forward reaction of the triplet to form C. The curved arrows represent the oscillatory, quantum mechanical interconversion of the singlet and triplet states, driven by internal magnetic interactions within the radicals. Whether a given radical pair reacts to form AB or C depends on the probability that it is singlet or triplet at the moment of reaction. If application of a magnetic field increases the triplet probability, the result will be an increased yield of the product C. Note that the radical pair need not be formed by electron transfer and that other reaction schemes are possible. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Hypothesis. The primary interaction mechanism is magnetic field (MF) effects on radical reactions in cryptochromes. Because the circadian clock is closely coupled with the regulation of responses to DNA damage and ROS, the primary interaction could lead to dysregulation of these systems, impaired DNA damage responses, genomic instability and finally to cancer. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. IARC. 2002. Non-ionizing radiation, part 1: static and extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields, vol. 80 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahlbom A, et al. 2000. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br. J. Cancer 83, 692–698. ( 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. 2007. Extremely low frequency fields. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
    1. Brocklehurst B, McLauchlan KA. 1996. Free radical mechanism for the effects of environmental electromagnetic fields on biological systems. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69, 3–24. ( 10.1080/095530096146147) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Timmel CR, Till U, Brocklehurst B, McLauchlan KA, Hore PJ. 1998. Effects of weak magnetic fields on free radical recombination reactions. Mol. Phys. 95, 71–89. ( 10.1080/00268979809483134) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources