Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 23;8(5):44.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0080-9.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2018

Affiliations
Review

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2018

Morie A Gertz. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) should be considered in any patient that presents to a cancer care provider with nephrotic range proteinuria, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy, unexplained hepatomegaly or diarrhea. More importantly, patients being monitored for smoldering multiple myeloma and a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are at risk for developing AL amyloidosis. MGUS and myeloma patients that have atypical features, including unexplained weight loss; lower extremity edema, early satiety, and dyspnea on exertion should be considered at risk for light chain amyloidosis. Overlooking the diagnosis of light chain amyloidosis leading to therapy delay is common, and it represents an error of diagnostic consideration. Algorithms will be provided on how to evaluate patients with suspected AL amyloid as well as how to manage patients referred from other medical specialties with biopsy-proven amyloid. An organized stepwise approach to the treatment of patients with light chain amyloidosis, including established and investigational therapies, will be reviewed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.A.G. reports personal fees from Ionis, personal fees from Alnylym, personal fees from Prothena, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Spectrum, personal fees from Annexon, personal fees from Appellis, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Medscape, personal fees from Physicians Education Resource, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Research to Practice, from Teva, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagnostic algorithm for patients that are being evaluated for a syndrome compatible with systemic amyloidosis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic algorithm for a patient referred with an established tissue biopsy diagnosis of amyloidosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pyrophosphate scan of a patient with TTR cardiac amyloidosis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Current treatment algorithm in light chain amyloidosis

References

    1. Kyle RA, et al. Incidence and natural history of primary systemic amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1950 through 1989. Blood. 1992;79:1817–1822. - PubMed
    1. Costa LJ, et al. Recent trends in multiple myeloma incidence and survival by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States. Blood Adv. 2017;1:282–287. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinney JH, et al. Systemic amyloidosis in England: an epidemiological study. Br. J. Haematol. 2013;161:525–532. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12286. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quock TP, Yan JT, Chang E, Guthrie SD, Broder MS. Epidemiology of AL amyloidosis in a US commercially insured population. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):5335.
    1. Tanskanen M, et al. Senile systemic amyloidosis affects 25% of the very aged and associates with genetic variation in alpha2-macroglobulin and tau: a population-based autopsy study. Ann. Med. 2008;40:232–239. doi: 10.1080/07853890701842988. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms