Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 24;8(5):47.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0085-4.

Myelodysplastic syndromes current treatment algorithm 2018

Affiliations
Review

Myelodysplastic syndromes current treatment algorithm 2018

David P Steensma. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) include a group of clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized by cytopenias due to ineffective hematopoiesis, abnormal blood and marrow cell morphology, and a risk of clonal evolution and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because outcomes for patients with MDS are heterogeneous, individual risk stratification using tools such as the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) is important in managing patients-including selecting candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the only potentially curative therapy for MDS. The IPSS-R can be supplemented by molecular genetic testing, since certain gene mutations such as TP53 influence risk independent of established clinicopathological variables. For lower risk patients with symptomatic anemia, treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or lenalidomide (especially for those with deletion of chromosome 5q) can ameliorate symptoms. Some lower risk patients may be candidates for immunosuppressive therapy, thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents, or a DNA hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine). Among higher risk patients, transplant candidates should undergo ASCT as soon as possible, with HMAs useful as a bridge to transplant. Non-transplant candidates should initiate HMA therapy and continue if tolerated until disease progression. Supportive care with transfusions and antimicrobial drugs as needed remains important in all groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Data safety monitoring committee: Janssen, Onconova, Takeda. Research support: H3 Biosciences, Celgene. Advisory board: Otsuka, Amphivena.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. MDS treatment algorithm as described in the text.
Clinical trials should be considered for all patients, but is recognized that many patients will not have access to trials or will not be eligible for available trials or will not want to go on trials, especially those requiring travel to a major center. In fact only a very small proportion of patients with MDS are currently enrolled on prospective interventional trials. However, increased trial enrollment is an important goal given the continued poor outcomes with MDS. EPO erythropoietin, ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, HMA DNA hypomethylating agent, IST immunosuppressive therapy (anti-thymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus)

References

    1. Tefferi A, Vardiman JW. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1872–1885. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0902908. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steensma DP. Myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015;90:969–983. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steensma DP, et al. Common troublesome symptoms and their impact on quality of life in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of a large internet-based survey. Leuk. Res. 2008;32:691–698. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sekeres MA, Cutler C. How we treat higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2014;123:829–836. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-08-496935. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone RM. How I treat patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2009;113:6296–6303. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-038935. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types