Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of scabies: A Delphi study of international experts
- PMID: 29795566
- PMCID: PMC5991412
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006549
Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of scabies: A Delphi study of international experts
Abstract
Background: Scabies was added to the WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases portfolio in 2017, and further understanding of the disease burden is now required. There are no uniformly accepted test methods or examination procedures for diagnosis, which limits the interpretation of research and epidemiological findings. The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) designated harmonization of diagnostic procedures as a priority for the development of a global control strategy. Therefore, we aimed to develop consensus criteria for the diagnosis of scabies.
Methodology / principal findings: We conducted an iterative, consensus (Delphi) study involving international experts in the diagnosis of scabies. Panel members were recruited through expression of interest and targeted invitation of experts. The Delphi study consisted of four rounds of anonymous surveys. Rounds 1 and 2 involved generation and ranking an extensive list of possible features. In Rounds 3 and 4, participants were presented results from previous rounds and indicated agreement with a series of draft criteria. Panel participants (n = 34, range per Round 28-30) were predominantly highly experienced clinicians, representing a range of clinical expertise and all inhabited continents. Based on initial rounds, a draft set of criteria were developed, incorporating three levels of diagnostic certainty-Confirmed Scabies, Clinical Scabies and Suspected Scabies. Consensus was reached in Round 4, with a very high level of agreement (> 89%) for all levels of criteria and subcategories. Adoption of the criteria was supported by 96% of panel members.
Conclusions / significance: Consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis were established with very high agreement. The 2018 IACS Criteria for the Diagnosis of Scabies can be implemented for scabies research and mapping projects, and for surveillance after control interventions. Validation of the criteria is required.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602. Epub 2016/10/14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Karimkhani C, Colombara DV, Drucker AM, Norton SA, Hay R, Engelman D, et al. The global burden of scabies: a cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2017. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30483-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Engelman D, Kiang K, Chosidow O, McCarthy J, Fuller C, Lammie P, et al. Toward the global control of human scabies: introducing the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013;7(8):e2167 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Report of the tenth meeting of the WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for neglected tropical diseases. 2017 [cited 17 March 2018]. Available from: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/NTD_STAG_report_2017.pdf?ua=1
-
- Romani L, Steer AC, Whitfeld MJ, Kaldor JM. Prevalence of scabies and impetigo worldwide: a systematic review. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2015;15(8):960–7. Epub 2015/06/20. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00132-2 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
